<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 529 Plans: Fees More Important than Deductions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-270848</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=3249#comment-270848</guid>
		<description>Yeah it definitely does, at first I was discounting the value of the tax deduction but it appears as though that&#039;s really the kicker. If you&#039;re an MD resident, the MD plan may be better as long as you&#039;re going strictly with the cheapest (expense ratio wise) index funds. The fund expense ratio differences at more active funds is significantly larger.

Oh, and to make it even closer, I had enough error, it turns out Nevada waives the $20 account fee if you have over $3000 in assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it definitely does, at first I was discounting the value of the tax deduction but it appears as though that&#8217;s really the kicker. If you&#8217;re an MD resident, the MD plan may be better as long as you&#8217;re going strictly with the cheapest (expense ratio wise) index funds. The fund expense ratio differences at more active funds is significantly larger.</p>
<p>Oh, and to make it even closer, I had enough error, it turns out Nevada waives the $20 account fee if you have over $3000 in assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-270840</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=3249#comment-270840</guid>
		<description>Ok . . . that gets the two plans closer but isn&#039;t the MD plan still cheaper when you look at the combined management and fund fees (.28% + .35% = .63% vs .65%)?

Once you add in the other sizable tax advantages of being a MD resident in addition to a waived annual fee the Maryland plan still clearly looks like the better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok . . . that gets the two plans closer but isn&#8217;t the MD plan still cheaper when you look at the combined management and fund fees (.28% + .35% = .63% vs .65%)?</p>
<p>Once you add in the other sizable tax advantages of being a MD resident in addition to a waived annual fee the Maryland plan still clearly looks like the better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-270838</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=3249#comment-270838</guid>
		<description>Money Monk: The management fee in Maryland doesn&#039;t include the underlying fees, the figure for Nevada does (I couldn&#039;t find the Nevada fees broken out), so it&#039;s really not an apples to apples comparison in that case. I should&#039;ve made it clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money Monk: The management fee in Maryland doesn&#8217;t include the underlying fees, the figure for Nevada does (I couldn&#8217;t find the Nevada fees broken out), so it&#8217;s really not an apples to apples comparison in that case. I should&#8217;ve made it clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-270836</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=3249#comment-270836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m completely following your thought process here. The Maryland Plan as you&#039;ve described appears to have three major advantages over the Nevada plan:

1) It should be fairly easy to get the $25 annual fee waived for Maryland. I cannot be waived in Nevada since your friend is not a resident.

2) The annual management fee for Maryland is considerably cheaper (.37%) than Nevada.

3) They&#039;ll get a $2500 tax break from Maryland (as you say, equal to about $150)

The only advantage I can see to the Nevada plan is the cheaper fees of the Vanguard funds but don&#039;t see how that comes close to offsetting the advantages of the Maryland plan. The difference in the cheaper funds doesn&#039;t even offset the higher NV management fees, not to mention the potential of an additional $175 savings using the MD plan.

Am I interpreting this incorrectly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m completely following your thought process here. The Maryland Plan as you&#8217;ve described appears to have three major advantages over the Nevada plan:</p>
<p>1) It should be fairly easy to get the $25 annual fee waived for Maryland. I cannot be waived in Nevada since your friend is not a resident.</p>
<p>2) The annual management fee for Maryland is considerably cheaper (.37%) than Nevada.</p>
<p>3) They&#8217;ll get a $2500 tax break from Maryland (as you say, equal to about $150)</p>
<p>The only advantage I can see to the Nevada plan is the cheaper fees of the Vanguard funds but don&#8217;t see how that comes close to offsetting the advantages of the Maryland plan. The difference in the cheaper funds doesn&#8217;t even offset the higher NV management fees, not to mention the potential of an additional $175 savings using the MD plan.</p>
<p>Am I interpreting this incorrectly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/529-plans-fees-more-important-than-deductions.html/comment-page-1#comment-270821</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=3249#comment-270821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually looking into opening a 529 for my son.  Our state has a deduction for the contribution, a matching program (basically $200 free dollars) which we just squeak under the income wire for, and low cost TIAA-CREF funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually looking into opening a 529 for my son.  Our state has a deduction for the contribution, a matching program (basically $200 free dollars) which we just squeak under the income wire for, and low cost TIAA-CREF funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

