Are Banks Failing Less Often?

Email  Print Print  

Fail!Back in 2008, I put together fifty fun facts about bank failures in which I looked at a bunch of FDIC and bank failure facts. I thought it was fun because I love trivia, I don’t think banks failing left and right is all that much fun!

Since the 2008 publishing, we’ve had a few years of turmoil in the banking industry, to say the least. Gone were the years like 2006, where not a single bank failed, and we all watched as banks failed left and right. In 2009, there were 140 failures. 2010 heralded 157 failures, which makes for a dreadful monthly average. April and July 2010 were particularly bad, twenty three and twenty two banks, respectively, failed that month.

It also seems as though bank failure news has exited mainstream media. You can probably attribute much of it to fatigue – it’s ceased to be interesting news. Everything that’s can be written about failing banks has been written. FDIC insurance – check. Don’t freak out please – check. Everything will be fine come Monday – check.

The big question is – are banks failing less often now? After triple digit bank failure years, how are we on pace this year?
It’s not looking good.

As of this past Friday, 123 banks have failed through the first twenty weeks of the year (they release data on Mondays, so I counted weeks by the number of Mondays in 2011). We’re on pace for around 319-320 bank failures this year.

The number of failures isn’t everything though. Fortunately, despite the frequency, the size of these failures is much smaller. Most of the banks had less than or around $300 million assets with just a few in excess of a few billion (two – United Western Bank in Colorado and Superior Bank in Alabama). It’s the smaller guys going under, which doesn’t make for interesting news on a national scale, but they’re still going.

That said, don’t be concerned that your bank is going to fail. The FDIC has your back. 🙂

(Photo: phobia)

{ 5 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts

RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

5 Responses to “Are Banks Failing Less Often?”

  1. zapeta says:

    At least two of the banks in my area in GA have failed this year, plus several banks have closed branches in my area. Its been interesting to watch the changing landscape of banks around here!

  2. Strebkr says:

    I’m sure there have been some small banks here and there, but I haven’t noticed any around me.

  3. Ken says:

    Where are you getting the 123 bank failures? Be careful not to confuse the updated column with the closed column in that FDIC table.

    There have only been 40 bank failures as of May 18, 2011. An easy way to get this number is to review the bottom of the latest FDIC bank-failure press release.

    The pace of bank failures have dropped off quite a bit in March. And you’re right about the sizes of the banks that have failed. Most are a lot smaller than those that failed in 2010 and 2009.

  4. Evan says:

    Maybe it is because where I am from, but when people talk about smaller banks I never get it. The only banks around me (NYC Suburb) are huge TBTF banks…even our credit unions are HUGE.

Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy

Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2016 by All rights reserved.