Taxes 
6
comments

Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Taxes

Email  Print Print  

TaxesOne of the biggest issues of the presidential campaign is taxes. Even though the economy seems to be one of the main focuses of the election, the reality is that voters really want to know how their bottom lines will be affected.

While each candidate has released some of their ideas for tax plans, the truth is that  for any of them to work, they have to get through Congress. However, learning a little bit more about the competing tax plans can provide an idea of the philosophy driving each candidate.

The Basics of President Obama’s Tax Plan

First of all, there are more details about what Obama plans, since the administration has had to share information about the plan in budget proposals. Here are some of the basics:

  • Most of the current tax rates would remain the same, but the top two marginal rates would rise on those with AGIs of $250,000 (couples) or $200,000 (singles). The 33% rate would move to 36%, and the 35% rate would move to 39.6%.
  • High earners would see a top rate of 20% on long-term capital gains, and dividends would be considered regular income.
  • The requirement of the health care reform law to raise Medicare taxes on earnings above $250,000 kicks in during 2013.
  • Itemized deductions for high earners would be limited.
  • The $2,500 college tuition tax credit, set to expire this year, would become permanent.

The real question is how long the tax situation would be sustainable, before more middle class taxpayers would have to see a bigger tax increase as well as the higher income earners, since the spending isn’t much changed, and the deficit could continue to grow.

According to the Tax Policy Center, changes would affect those earning as little as $75,000 by increasing taxes by about $45 a year. For those earning between $100,000 and $200,000, the increase would be $219. It really doesn’t start increasing a great deal until earnings make at least $500,000 — at which point the likely tax increase would be $25,000.

The Basics of Governor Romney’s Tax Plan

While Obama is clear that he would raise taxes on the rich, Romney is equally clear that isn’t an option. The basics of Romney’s plan, as it has been explained so far, include:

  • Promises to ensure that current lower rates do not expire, and then to work to reduce each tax rate by 20%.
  • Taxes on investments and savings would be eliminated for those couples earning less than $200,000 a year (or $100,000 for singles).
  • Limits on tax breaks (but there are no details on which tax breaks would be eliminated)
  • Wants to repeal the Health Care Reform law, eliminating the Medicare tax on high earners.

Even though the Romney campaign disagrees with the analysis from the Tax Policy Center, the Center still reports that those earning $75,000 would see a tax savings of $2,000 a year. The largest savings, those, are for those who earn more than $500,000 a year: The Tax Policy Center predicts that they would end up with what amounts to a 10% increase in after-tax income.

There haven’t been a lot of details, but some analysts believe that, even with the budget cuts being proposed, they aren’t enough to offset the cost of the tax reductions in a way to effectively reduce the deficit.

What do you think? Which plan do you think is most likely to succeed? And which do you agree with?
(Photo: Tax Credits)

{ 6 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts


RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

6 Responses to “Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Taxes”

  1. tom says:

    Neither.

    Both tax plans are unsustainable.

    This is a wish list:

    In order to fix this whole mess, deficit, debt, etc, you need to completely overhaul the tax code. Eliminate loopholes, deductions for corporations and anyone below the poverty line. Then lower taxes for everyone. In order to make this “fair”, no industry should receive a subsidy.

    After the tax code is updated, entitlements need to be completely reformed. You can’t talk taxes without talking entitlements.

    The affordable care act needs to be completely scrapped. In it’s place, let’s put a system that covers everyone, but also addresses competition (open state lines), penalizes unhealthy behavior, and tort reform. Both sides win.

    Social Security needs an overhaul as well. Make it an option to go private or public, but if you opt to go private, a portion of your and your employer’s payments will go to the public plan to cover those with lower than the minimum account balances (the poor).

    FICA taxes should go up, but if you want to sustain these massive programs, even with overhauls, they need to be funded.

    Basically, if you look at the Simpson-Bowles plan, it says the same thing.

    Everyone needs to share in sacrifice to fix our economy and secure our future, everyone.

  2. Aaron says:

    Thanks Miranda. It’s really helpful to see their policies laid out like this.

  3. ChrisCD says:

    It has always been and will always be a spending problem. The country can’t afford the level of spending that is going on.

    When you can’t balance your check book at home, you have to cut things out. You first start with non-essentials and if you still can’t get it right, you have to cut back.

    The Gov’t needs to do the same. At least Romney has indicated programs need to be cut and even named a few. However, I don’t agree with a bunch of tax cuts at this point. Until the Gov’t can demonstrate that it can control itself, I don’t support any tax increases either.

  4. I like ChrisCD’s comment. We have to get spending under control. Citizen’s can’t continue to bear over ambitious wage and salary taxes, just as businesses can’t.

  5. Mike says:

    I agree that the problem is mostly about government spending. The chart shows it’s been especially bad since 2009.

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=200

  6. john wyatt says:

    Honestly, I voted Obama in 08´but he´s just a BIG spender. I understand he came into office with a huge problem but seems like he just cant handle the load. I also understand the republicans are also big spenders but I have hope in Romney because of his experience as a businessman. So, in essence- I also believe spending is our problem and our politicians should be more fiscally responsible spending OUR moneys.


Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy


Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2014 by www.Bargaineering.com. All rights reserved.