Why You Should Convert IRAs in 2010

Email  Print Print  

Nest Eggs!Can you believe it’s November already? As our thoughts go to preparing that gluttonous Thanksgiving meal and the feasts yet to come during the holidays, one thought you might want to spend a few cycles on is whether you want to convert your Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010, rather than 2011. If you’re unfamiliar with this whole subject, I invite you to check out this Roth IRA conversion mini-roundup to familiarize yourself with the process.

This post will discuss the idea of whether you should convert your IRA to a Roth IRA this year, in 2010, or if you should wait until next year.

Splitting the Tax Bill

If you convert in 2010, you have the option to pay all the tax at once on your 2010 return or you can split it in half to be paid on your 2011 and 2012 returns. The tricky part of this decision is that while we know what the tax brackets are for 2010, we aren’t entirely sure what they’ll be in 2011 and 2012. All the proposals on the table don’t really make it easier for us to guess, though if you earn under $250,000 a year you will probably see your taxes remain the same (all the proposals seem to favor that, unless they can’t reach an agreement… then everyone’s bill goes up).

So while the tax rates in 2011 and 2012 aren’t set in stone, the idea that you can put off taxes until then is probably appealing. The risk is that you will have to come up with the money to pay for the conversion in 2011 and 2012, which can be a good or a bad thing. You don’t want to be sideswiped with a huge tax bill in two years.

Useful tax planning tool: I discovered this Kiplinger Roth IRA conversion tax calculator that takes into account the various tax proposals.

Income Shaping

Now that you have the option of choosing, you might discover that 2010 is a good year to do the conversion because of your income. When you convert, you have to realize the conversion amount as income. This has the effect of pushing you up into higher tax brackets which can affect the rate of the tax as well as what other tax deductions and credits you may be eligible for. Many deductions and credits are phased out and eliminated at higher incomes, so this is something you want to consider.

If you have a large IRA to convert, you may want to take the hit all at once and eliminate a credit or deduction for just 2010, instead of eliminated it for 2011 and 2012.

Those are just two reasons why you might want to convert your IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010 and whether you should split the income into 2011 and 2012 or realize in 2010. If you elect to convert in 2011, you won’t have the option to split the bill.

(Photo: jkonig)

{ 4 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts

RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

4 Responses to “Why You Should Convert IRAs in 2010”

  1. Bob says:

    Is it worth it to convert if you have a small IRA? Say under 5,000?

    • zapeta says:

      Great question. I’m in roughly the same boat. I decided not to convert because I don’t want to hassle with it.

  2. Valerie says:

    I knew about the conversion, but did NOT know about splitting the taxes. That is great. Is there any word on conversions being allowed next year or not?

    • James says:

      I believe conversions can happen any year. This year is special for two reasons: high-earners (>100k) can convert for the first time and the tax bill being split over two years if you so choose.

Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy

Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2016 by All rights reserved.