<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frugality and Index Fund Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:09:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>Nickel - SPDRs and ETFs each also have an expense ratio built in.  For example, SPY (&lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=SPY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yahoo Info&lt;/a&gt;) has an ER of 0.11%.  Wow, that&#039;s low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nickel &#8211; SPDRs and ETFs each also have an expense ratio built in.  For example, SPY (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=SPY" rel="nofollow">Yahoo Info</a>) has an ER of 0.11%.  Wow, that&#8217;s low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3762</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3762</guid>
		<description>What about things like SPDRs? Don&#039;t you just pay the commission, and no further fees? If you&#039;re planning on holding for a long time, it seems like that might turn out for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about things like SPDRs? Don&#8217;t you just pay the commission, and no further fees? If you&#8217;re planning on holding for a long time, it seems like that might turn out for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3606</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3606</guid>
		<description>Tony - I don&#039;t really know how 2% stacks up for an actively managed fund, does that include every single fee or just the manager&#039;s fee? 17% return is great but that&#039;s not predictable, the fee is, but sounds like you made a good choice though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; I don&#8217;t really know how 2% stacks up for an actively managed fund, does that include every single fee or just the manager&#8217;s fee? 17% return is great but that&#8217;s not predictable, the fee is, but sounds like you made a good choice though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3605</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3605</guid>
		<description>jim -- Yes, that&#039;s my point, and it sounds like we&#039;re in agreement. Just don&#039;t forget that in order for a menu of stocks to match an index, the fund needs to be regularly rebalanced and there is a human deciding which subset of stocks comprise of an index based on an often subjective choice of metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jim &#8212; Yes, that&#8217;s my point, and it sounds like we&#8217;re in agreement. Just don&#8217;t forget that in order for a menu of stocks to match an index, the fund needs to be regularly rebalanced and there is a human deciding which subset of stocks comprise of an index based on an often subjective choice of metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>What about mutual funds? What percent fee is too high? I am in a few mutual funds that are charging ~2%, am I crazy b/c my &quot;broker/finanical advisor&quot; says I am not.  (fund performance has been ~17% over last 3yr)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about mutual funds? What percent fee is too high? I am in a few mutual funds that are charging ~2%, am I crazy b/c my &#8220;broker/finanical advisor&#8221; says I am not.  (fund performance has been ~17% over last 3yr)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>Avery - On a typical (non-index) fund I would agree, but usually index funds aren&#039;t actively managed because the menu of stocks they own match the indices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avery &#8211; On a typical (non-index) fund I would agree, but usually index funds aren&#8217;t actively managed because the menu of stocks they own match the indices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMF</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>FMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows that $19.99 is waaaaaaaaay cheaper than $20. Just ask Walmart! ;-)

(It&#039;s psychological, of course.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that $19.99 is waaaaaaaaay cheaper than $20. Just ask Walmart! <img src='http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(It&#8217;s psychological, of course.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3565</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3565</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the fund fee you need to look at, it&#039;s also how actively managed the fund is that you need to look at. The more actively managed, the more the fund is buying and selling, and the more it will cost you in capital gains taxes. Index funds avoid most (but not all) of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the fund fee you need to look at, it&#8217;s also how actively managed the fund is that you need to look at. The more actively managed, the more the fund is buying and selling, and the more it will cost you in capital gains taxes. Index funds avoid most (but not all) of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>But if the two are right next to each other, why would you pick the $20 one when you can get the same item for $19.99?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if the two are right next to each other, why would you pick the $20 one when you can get the same item for $19.99?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html/comment-page-1#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/frugality-and-index-fund-fees.html#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that there&#039;s no difference between $19.99 and $20.00. There&#039;s REALLY no practical difference. Putting in the miniscule effort to chose one over the other is a waste of time, and time is money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that there&#8217;s no difference between $19.99 and $20.00. There&#8217;s REALLY no practical difference. Putting in the miniscule effort to chose one over the other is a waste of time, and time is money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
