<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Mason (and Others) Makes SAT Optional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:56:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html/comment-page-1#comment-8637</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html#comment-8637</guid>
		<description>This is very exciting.  I&#039;ve never been a good standardized test taker, and the SATs/ACTs were the bane of my existence back in the day... as were the GMATs last year.  Now if only we could get into B-School on excellent performance reviews alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very exciting.  I&#8217;ve never been a good standardized test taker, and the SATs/ACTs were the bane of my existence back in the day&#8230; as were the GMATs last year.  Now if only we could get into B-School on excellent performance reviews alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html/comment-page-1#comment-8607</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/george-mason-and-others-makes-sat-optional.html#comment-8607</guid>
		<description>I think the original idea was the have an easy way to categorize people on their intelligence or aptitude in certain areas.  Problem is it tests two things: how much preparation you did for it and aptitudes that are not always directly related to how well your going to do in college.  After a person passes a certain level of intelligence, the most important factor on how well they will do is worth ethic and time management.  Devise an &quot;SAT&quot; to test those and your college admissions staff is much better prepared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the original idea was the have an easy way to categorize people on their intelligence or aptitude in certain areas.  Problem is it tests two things: how much preparation you did for it and aptitudes that are not always directly related to how well your going to do in college.  After a person passes a certain level of intelligence, the most important factor on how well they will do is worth ethic and time management.  Devise an &#8220;SAT&#8221; to test those and your college admissions staff is much better prepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
