<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Messing With the Layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-422</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because of the pair of double dashes you put between your comment and your link, it makes the text above it enormous - probably a equix &quot;feature.&quot;

Oh, and with regard to your stats, I wasn&#039;t so much conerned about sitemeter or bbclone (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bargaineering.com/bbclone&quot;&gt;http://www.bargaineering.com/bbclone&lt;/a&gt;), but I have snippets of SQL code that upgrade a hit counter for each post so I know how many views each one has received. This was before those plugins came out and so I&#039;ve just kept my own stuff and kept hacking away at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because of the pair of double dashes you put between your comment and your link, it makes the text above it enormous &#8211; probably a equix &#8220;feature.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, and with regard to your stats, I wasn&#8217;t so much conerned about sitemeter or bbclone (<a href="http://www.bargaineering.com/bbclone">http://www.bargaineering.com/bbclone</a>), but I have snippets of SQL code that upgrade a hit counter for each post so I know how many views each one has received. This was before those plugins came out and so I&#8217;ve just kept my own stuff and kept hacking away at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Again with mega-font... I swear I&#039;m not doing anything to trigger it.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivecentnickel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fivecentnickel.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with mega-font&#8230; I swear I&#8217;m not doing anything to trigger it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/" rel="nofollow">fivecentnickel.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 13:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-419</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re worried about messing up your traffic stats, I suggest you try StatCounter. Since SiteMeter can only exclude self-visits based on IP addresses, it doesn&#039;t give accurate stats unless you have a static IP. StatCounter offers cookie-based blocking of visit counts so you can get a much more accurate read on your stats -- simply set the cookie and then you can revisit your site as much as you want without it getting coutned. You&#039;ll still throw off the AdSense impression counting, but otherwise it works great.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivecentnickel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fivecentnickel.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re worried about messing up your traffic stats, I suggest you try StatCounter. Since SiteMeter can only exclude self-visits based on IP addresses, it doesn&#8217;t give accurate stats unless you have a static IP. StatCounter offers cookie-based blocking of visit counts so you can get a much more accurate read on your stats &#8212; simply set the cookie and then you can revisit your site as much as you want without it getting coutned. You&#8217;ll still throw off the AdSense impression counting, but otherwise it works great.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fivecentnickel.com/" rel="nofollow">fivecentnickel.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 05:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-417</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t seem to know why this happens but when you load up a single post, the main text panel isn&#039;t sized correctly (white background with respect to the gray back-background). But if you resize the page, it paints correctly. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t seem to know why this happens but when you load up a single post, the main text panel isn&#8217;t sized correctly (white background with respect to the gray back-background). But if you resize the page, it paints correctly. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 05:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-416</guid>
		<description>As for the max width issue, you can always resize the browser right? I&#039;m running 1600x1200 right now so it&#039;s pretty wide for me but I didn&#039;t immediately recognize any issues thus far.

I think I&#039;m going to adjust the micro-font for comments, I didn&#039;t really like it but I also don&#039;t read comments in the typical manner as most readers so I didn&#039;t even think about it (I read them through Wordpress&#039; admin so I fudge up traffic statistics as little as possible). Thanks for the reminder though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the max width issue, you can always resize the browser right? I&#8217;m running 1600&#215;1200 right now so it&#8217;s pretty wide for me but I didn&#8217;t immediately recognize any issues thus far.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m going to adjust the micro-font for comments, I didn&#8217;t really like it but I also don&#8217;t read comments in the typical manner as most readers so I didn&#8217;t even think about it (I read them through Wordpress&#8217; admin so I fudge up traffic statistics as little as possible). Thanks for the reminder though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 05:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-415</guid>
		<description>The max width of 100% is pretty difficult to read large chunks of text for someone who&#039;s monitor&#039;s set to a fairly high rez (ala anything 1280x1024+), but maybe that&#039;s just me. Same for the micro font size you&#039;re using for comments - but again, I&#039;m using a pretty high rez, so it might just be me (and it doesn&#039;t really matter all that much, since firefox will let me jack up the font size to something more comfortable for my not-so-young-anymore eyes - those stuck in IE land are fairly screwed tho, with the fonts being defined in pixels and all, and thus unresizeable).

Been working a bit on a makeover on my site as well (instead of posts to it, apparently), but I&#039;m anal enough that I won&#039;t really consider a switch over until it&#039;s pretty well flawless... good luck with yours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The max width of 100% is pretty difficult to read large chunks of text for someone who&#8217;s monitor&#8217;s set to a fairly high rez (ala anything 1280&#215;1024+), but maybe that&#8217;s just me. Same for the micro font size you&#8217;re using for comments &#8211; but again, I&#8217;m using a pretty high rez, so it might just be me (and it doesn&#8217;t really matter all that much, since firefox will let me jack up the font size to something more comfortable for my not-so-young-anymore eyes &#8211; those stuck in IE land are fairly screwed tho, with the fonts being defined in pixels and all, and thus unresizeable).</p>
<p>Been working a bit on a makeover on my site as well (instead of posts to it, apparently), but I&#8217;m anal enough that I won&#8217;t really consider a switch over until it&#8217;s pretty well flawless&#8230; good luck with yours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Hahaha, you run the same thing nickel. :) I&#039;m thinking about a third column... it&#039;s a bigger &quot;shock&quot; to the layout than the fluid text columns. I have to figure out what I want to do with it before I add it in.

I&#039;m thinking about chopping the header in half and putting some stuff there - it&#039;s a lot of wasted space. Or I might add some color to this place... everything blue, gray and white. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha, you run the same thing nickel. <img src='http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m thinking about a third column&#8230; it&#8217;s a bigger &#8220;shock&#8221; to the layout than the fluid text columns. I have to figure out what I want to do with it before I add it in.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking about chopping the header in half and putting some stuff there &#8211; it&#8217;s a lot of wasted space. Or I might add some color to this place&#8230; everything blue, gray and white. <img src='http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html/comment-page-1#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 20:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/messing-with-the-layout.html#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I like the fluid text column. Are you going to try and add a third column?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fluid text column. Are you going to try and add a third column?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
