<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Retirement Option &#8211; Roth 401k Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:32:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roth 401k</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Roth 401k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>Here is some more information:

http://www.roth-401k-forum.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is some more information:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.roth-401k-forum.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.roth-401k-forum.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Another Bean Counter,
Glad to have you back :)

It appears that you&#039;re right, when I read that it was separately tracked I thought it meant that included the totals - but according to the CNN Money article, and closer examination of the regulations, it appears that your total Roth and Regular 401(k) contributions are capped at $15k. That is, of course, if your employer adds the Roth option. I&#039;ll be amending the article to reflect that, Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Bean Counter,<br />
Glad to have you back <img src='http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It appears that you&#8217;re right, when I read that it was separately tracked I thought it meant that included the totals &#8211; but according to the CNN Money article, and closer examination of the regulations, it appears that your total Roth and Regular 401(k) contributions are capped at $15k. That is, of course, if your employer adds the Roth option. I&#8217;ll be amending the article to reflect that, Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Bean Counter</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Bean Counter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Hey Jim. I&#039;ve read your blog a couple of times. 

About the Roth 401(k) you said that you can still contribute the maximum limits for both a Roth 401(k) and a regular 401(k), right? From what I&#039;ve read and understood an individual will not be able to contribute the max to other retirement accounts and still contribute the max to a roth 401(k), (once it becomes available). There are certain limitations, aren&#039;t there? What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jim. I&#8217;ve read your blog a couple of times. </p>
<p>About the Roth 401(k) you said that you can still contribute the maximum limits for both a Roth 401(k) and a regular 401(k), right? From what I&#8217;ve read and understood an individual will not be able to contribute the max to other retirement accounts and still contribute the max to a roth 401(k), (once it becomes available). There are certain limitations, aren&#8217;t there? What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-698</guid>
		<description>thc,
why don&#039;t you think employers would implement it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thc,<br />
why don&#8217;t you think employers would implement it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimL</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>JimL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Bad news for government employees: Participants in the 401(k) &quot;equivalent&quot; known as 457(b) are out of luck, apparently. Some time ago I made an inquiry on this and got a reply from a Washington lawyer &quot;close to the situation.&quot; He told me that 457(b) plans either weren&#039;t part of the conversation when the law was drafted, or it was determined that the cost would be too great.

And THC, I hope you&#039;re wrong, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news for government employees: Participants in the 401(k) &#8220;equivalent&#8221; known as 457(b) are out of luck, apparently. Some time ago I made an inquiry on this and got a reply from a Washington lawyer &#8220;close to the situation.&#8221; He told me that 457(b) plans either weren&#8217;t part of the conversation when the law was drafted, or it was determined that the cost would be too great.</p>
<p>And THC, I hope you&#8217;re wrong, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-696</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid there won&#039;t be loads of employers who take the time and effort to add the Roth component to their 401(k)s.  I hope that I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid there won&#8217;t be loads of employers who take the time and effort to add the Roth component to their 401(k)s.  I hope that I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-692</guid>
		<description>A 401(k) is a retirement plan named after the IRS code section that permits it. Essentially it allows you to contribute money, pre-tax, to a retirement account and typically your employer will provide a small percentage match. For me, when I contribute 6% of my salary, I receive a 3% contribution from my company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 401(k) is a retirement plan named after the IRS code section that permits it. Essentially it allows you to contribute money, pre-tax, to a retirement account and typically your employer will provide a small percentage match. For me, when I contribute 6% of my salary, I receive a 3% contribution from my company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Loree</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty Loree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Canadian.... what&#039;s a 401k?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Canadian&#8230;. what&#8217;s a 401k?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncnblog</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>ncnblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Hay, just found your site.  Great, great stuff. I have blog-rolled you.  Check out my site and see what you think.  Keep up the great, informative work.
ncnblog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay, just found your site.  Great, great stuff. I have blog-rolled you.  Check out my site and see what you think.  Keep up the great, informative work.<br />
ncnblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 20:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder nickel, I added a little update... but essentially there will be a Roth 403(b) version too. This all, of course, hinges on whether or not your employer will even offer the plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder nickel, I added a little update&#8230; but essentially there will be a Roth 403(b) version too. This all, of course, hinges on whether or not your employer will even offer the plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html/comment-page-1#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/new-retirement-option-roth-401k.html#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Any idea if there will be a 403(b) version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea if there will be a 403(b) version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
