<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No 401(k) Employer Match? No Problem!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:01:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-20700</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-20700</guid>
		<description>Jim:  Sorry I haven&#039;t been back in a few days.  Yes, safe harbor contributions are fully vested immediately and no, profit sharing contributions that vest on a 5-year schedule do not qualify.  Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim:  Sorry I haven&#8217;t been back in a few days.  Yes, safe harbor contributions are fully vested immediately and no, profit sharing contributions that vest on a 5-year schedule do not qualify.  Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19876</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-19876</guid>
		<description>Must safe harbor contributions vest immediately? The profit sharing vests 20% a year across 5 years... so would it still qualify as a safe harbor contribution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must safe harbor contributions vest immediately? The profit sharing vests 20% a year across 5 years&#8230; so would it still qualify as a safe harbor contribution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19868</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-19868</guid>
		<description>Sorry if I was brash.  What you are referring to is an employer&#039;s Safe Harbor Contribution.  It allows them to escape performing nondiscrimination testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I was brash.  What you are referring to is an employer&#8217;s Safe Harbor Contribution.  It allows them to escape performing nondiscrimination testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19771</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-19771</guid>
		<description>The difference is I don&#039;t need to contribute in order to receive my employer&#039;s contribution. 

THC - If my blog offends your CFP sensibilities so much, feel free to stop reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is I don&#8217;t need to contribute in order to receive my employer&#8217;s contribution. </p>
<p>THC &#8211; If my blog offends your CFP sensibilities so much, feel free to stop reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thc</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19767</link>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-19767</guid>
		<description>A company match and  profit-sharing are the same thing.  You should do a little research on how defined contribuiton plans work if you&#039;re going to pretend to give financial advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company match and  profit-sharing are the same thing.  You should do a little research on how defined contribuiton plans work if you&#8217;re going to pretend to give financial advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19489</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/no-401k-employer-match-no-problem.html#comment-19489</guid>
		<description>What do you think if the employer offers no 401k at all?  How much is the extra 11k savings room versus just a traditional IRA worth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think if the employer offers no 401k at all?  How much is the extra 11k savings room versus just a traditional IRA worth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
