Obama’s Emergency Economic Plan Released: Second Stimulus Check & Growth Funds
In early June, Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama’s mentioned a need for another stimulus check. Then, in late July, there were rumblings in Congress that Democrats were looking to put together another stimulus package that may or may not include a check to families. There was a move by Democrats to try to pass the aspects of the first stimulus package, which included a check, that were struck down in the name of expediency.
Senator Obama released this six-page policy paper that outlines a two-part stimulus package.
Part 1: Emergency Energy Rebate Checks: The first part would include an “emergency energy rebate.” Individuals would receive $500 and married couples would receive $1000. The checks would be paid for over five years by a windfall tax on oil company profits. The six-page document explains the nature of the checks but doesn’t illustrate how the windfall profits might be taxed (granted, given the political nature of the document, it might be out of scope).
Part 2: $25B State Growth Fund & $25B Jobs and Growth Fund. The second part has itself two parts. The State Growth Fund would help prevent state and local cuts in services like education and housing assistance as well as alleviate the need to increase taxes, tolls, and fees. Many states are feeling the pinch as housing prices fall, foreclosures rise, and real estate tax revenue falling. The Jobs and Growth Fund is really an infrastructure bill that would support maintenance of highways, roads, and bridges; as well as fast-track school repair projects. There is no mention of how this would be funded.
My Thoughts: I didn’t like the stimulus checks but having listened to their use in the 70s in Greenspan’s anecdotal Age of Turbulence, I’m not wholly against them as a mechanism for thwarting an economic slowdown. However, it’s becoming increasingly evident that the checks are as much about politics as they are about prevent a slowdown. While I would imagine the economic policy advisors on Obama’s staff are well versed in macr- and microeconomics, I wonder how much of it is influenced by a desire to win in November.
That being said, people are getting pinched. Not everyone is getting pinched, but a lot of people are and additional funds would help some remain solvent. My concern is that with a deficit nearing half a trillion dollars, we’re sacrificing our future prosperity for relief today. This is exactly the same thinking that gets many people into deep credit card debt. “Just a little more relief…”
Finally, what are the chances this actually happens? Democrats had difficulty extending unemployment benefits and those go only to those who have already lost their jobs. You can argue that some people getting the first stimulus checks didn’t need them, but unemployment benefits only go to those who are unemployed! It’s difficult to say if this plan would even fly, but it makes for an interesting discussion. So, what do you think?
(Photo: chadwho1ders)
Did you like this article? If so, you can get all the latest articles delivered to your email inbox for free each morning by entering your email address in the box below. Your email will only be used to deliver this once-daily subscription and you can unsubscribe at any time.





There are 8 comments, add your thoughts now!
Ah yes the “windfall profits”. If the idea of taxing “windfall profits” sounds good to you please take a drive off your nearest bridge.
Haha someone’s in a feisty mood today!
Personally, I don’t like windfall profit taxes because it’s penalizing success. Since when did we do that in America? However, I would like to see the tightening up of corporate taxes though.
I don’t care for windfall profit taxes either, but usually the time of passing them is when they soon become obsolete, so it could be a good sign. As far as rebates, the same thing occurs with tax cuts, so no difference there other than rebates are likely more stimulative, and tax cuts end up being future tax increases.
Well, the windfall profits tax is a populist idea. It’ll just increase the price at the pumps.
The $1000 energy rebate check is a poor idea, in that the money could better be spent in supporting the construction of new nuclear power plants. Nuclear energy would provide stable energy pricing for Americans.
The $25B for states? CA has a $17B deficit all by itself!
The windfall tax check is the definition of communism. Barry is an absolute Marxist, and this proves it. He is penalizing companies who have legally earned their money and redistributing it to those who have done nothing to deserve it. I fear for our economy if he is elected. I can’t believe what a right-winger this guy is making me!
It seems the government is always trying to give something back when the economy is on the verge of a meltdown. If they would just stop taking it from us in the first place we wouldn’t be where we are at today.
Out government is wasteful, arrogant, and elitist, both parties I might add. If they would just stop the out of control spending I think we all would be quite alright.
But what are the chances of that really happening? Zilch, so I ‘ll take whatever they give me, continue to pay off, and build my wealth so I am not dependent on them for my retirement.
Regards
I’m relatively liberal (at least I used to think I was) and I’m not all that comfortable with the idea of a windfall profits tax. At the same time, I’m especially unhappy with the significant subsidies the oil companies are getting, though I’ll admit I don’t know a lot about that. Why not axe the subsidies to an industry that’s doing quite well, and avoid these somewhat random taxes? Actually, what I want to see is a comprehensive carbon tax / energy policy that could (1) extract money for now and (2) help wean us from oil, hopefully. At least it’s on more ground than “you’re making too much money.”Furthermore, check this clash videos I found yesterday about the US Presidential candidates have talked taxes. Well, it’s entitled Obama v. McCain on Taxes. Watch these statements - then vote in http://clashorama.com/index.php?id=194
I Didn’t see any of you nitwit ’s complainting about the so call president that’s residing in office right nowyou needto shut up which would be smart.
Previous Article: « WIN: 2009 Projected Deficit: $482 Billion
Next Article: Roundup: Thanks For Voting! »