<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official Tax Reform Panel Recommendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/official-tax-reform-panel-recommendations.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/official-tax-reform-panel-recommendations.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:01:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/official-tax-reform-panel-recommendations.html/comment-page-1#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=428#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>Remember, it&#039;s the panel that proposed these reforms and not the President. But, considering these plans are supposed to be revenue neutral, I don&#039;t see how the mortgage interest cap won&#039;t be put into effect if the AMT is repealed. (no other proposal appears to really generate additional tax revenue on the same magnitude as the AMT)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, it&#8217;s the panel that proposed these reforms and not the President. But, considering these plans are supposed to be revenue neutral, I don&#8217;t see how the mortgage interest cap won&#8217;t be put into effect if the AMT is repealed. (no other proposal appears to really generate additional tax revenue on the same magnitude as the AMT)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/official-tax-reform-panel-recommendations.html/comment-page-1#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=428#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>There better well be grandfather clauses in this tax change or I am marching down to the White House and protesting.  I am (this might turn into was) a supporter of the current Pres, but this one really irks me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There better well be grandfather clauses in this tax change or I am marching down to the White House and protesting.  I am (this might turn into was) a supporter of the current Pres, but this one really irks me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
