<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patented Tax Shelters Not Necessarily Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/patented-tax-shelters-not-necessarily-legal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/patented-tax-shelters-not-necessarily-legal.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/patented-tax-shelters-not-necessarily-legal.html/comment-page-1#comment-19006</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/patented-tax-shelters-not-necessarily-legal.html#comment-19006</guid>
		<description>The patent office never has been required to check patent applications for legality. But they are required to check for utility...and in the case of a tax shelter, utility is almost entirely a function of legality. After all, if it isn&#039;t legal, then it doesn&#039;t actually accomplish its stated function (shelter your money from tax) and thus fails the utility test.

But then, the incompetence of patent examiners is a matter of song and legend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patent office never has been required to check patent applications for legality. But they are required to check for utility&#8230;and in the case of a tax shelter, utility is almost entirely a function of legality. After all, if it isn&#8217;t legal, then it doesn&#8217;t actually accomplish its stated function (shelter your money from tax) and thus fails the utility test.</p>
<p>But then, the incompetence of patent examiners is a matter of song and legend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

