Retirement 
6
comments

Raid that 401(k)!

Email  Print Print  

Ha! Just kidding. Unless it’s a dire emergency, no one should consider touching that 401(k) because it’s tantamount to robbing your future self… and your future self would be pissed. So why did 45% of a 200k polled by Hewitt Associates opt to take the cash after leaving work? Perhaps it’s because they don’t know the ramifications (it’s taxed as income and then you’re nicked for a 10% penalty!) of their actions? If you look at the dollar amounts it’s even more staggering: if you’re 401(k) value is under $10,000, that little devil telling you to raid is three times fatter than the angel! (72.5% take it out).



This defies reason, especially the final stat: With only $10,000 and assuming a 25% tax rate, we’re talking a tax of $3,500 on $10,000. You only get $6,500 bucks to spend now… that’s a huge tax hit to be taking now on money you should’ve programmed yourself to forget.

Another interesting statistic, showing the general financial immaturity of the 20-29 age group, is that they’re the most likely to raid the kitty (of course, we do need the money, right?) compared to older folks. Those who cringe should take heart, 32% keep everything status quo after leaving a job and 23% roll them over.

This reminded me of a friend who wanted to raid the 401(k) to buy a boat, luckily his future self won out and he didn’t, but he would’ve been pissed when the rest of us were sipping martini’s on our yachts (ha!) and he was stuck with his 40 year old dingy. :)

{ 6 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts


RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

6 Responses to “Raid that 401(k)!”

  1. John says:

    My personal observation is those who save for the future either use their retirement money to pay for the nursing home bills or die and leave their money to their heirs. Your friend who spend their money on the little dingy may not feel so bad if he knew this.

  2. jim says:

    One can never predict the future but he or she can certainly plan for it. There is something to be said about enjoying life now but that can be funded by something other than a 401(k).

  3. John says:

    “One can never predict the future ….” When it comes to economics, everything is in the details. Suzie Orman said IRAs/401Ks are trouble. I tend to believe her. Unless, the employer matches your contribution, economically, there’s no point to it. For many of us, the employer does not match. Yet, no one teaches this except Ms. Orman. As she points out, it is probable that the tax bite will be worse in the future to pay for the high deficit of today. Tax savings today is an illusion. The point of saving for retirement in accounts that we can’t touch for 30 to 40 years makes very little sense. These IRAs/401Ks are resembling the scheme of the social security system.

  4. jim says:

    Yes, I think a lot of people overvalue 401(k)’s in that they don’t consider how much higher taxes will be in the future. I think sometime between now and when I’m 65 (40 years!) there will be nationalized health care (in addition to paying off the debt) which will mean a much higher tax rate, similar (higher) to how the rates in Europe compare to ours today. I contributed to my 401(k) because I could get a company match and I always contribute the maximum to the Roth IRA.

    The economic point of IRAs is the hope that your rate of return on a larger sum (because it is pre-tax dollars) will outweigh the larger tax bite of the future. Is it folly? Perhaps, but time will be the final arbiter.

  5. John says:

    I’m really down on this IRA/401K scheme. They have so many pitfalls that it resembles a scam. My wife and I have both and the government keeps changes the rules every few years that some of the accounts become useless. For example, I don’t know anyone except the government that touts these things and next year, implements a law saying you are not qualify to contribute anymore. My IRA is now dead. Another example is where you can’t tell how much you can contribute during the year because there’s a law that the employer must calculate the average of the whole company and if you’re over this amount, they refund your excess contribution the next year to you but tell you that you must include it in the previous year’s income tax return. Can you ever anticipate your tax bite this way? Or is it just a way to penalize ignorant people for trying to contribute to their retirement? Do people realize that most countries don’t tax investments so there is no need for retirement funds to shelter your income?

  6. John says:

    I hope the last post helps some people realizes the pitfalls of the IRAs/401s. By the time many of these problems come about, we were well into them.


Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy


Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2014 by www.Bargaineering.com. All rights reserved.