Investing 
4
comments

Reviewing and Rebalancing Your Portfolio

Email  Print Print  

Every year, or every six months if you’re so inclined, you should review and potentially rebalance your portfolio. This is important because throughout the year the actual percentage an asset is in your portfolio will have changed from your original allocation. The reason this occurs is because some assets appreciated faster than others and so they make up a greater (or lesser) portion now. If you asset allocation strategy has not changed, you would do well to readjust the percentages back to your plan as long as it doesn’t cost you a significant amount. The process can be as quick as five minutes or five hours but its critical that you spend the time.



In my company sponsored 401(k) plan, I have the option of putting the funds into a brokerage account with Charles Schwab, putting the funds into a selection of numerous funds, or a mix of both. Until the last three months, I’ve opted to simply divvy up my contribution among the numerous funds with nearly all of it in stocks and a third of that allocation in emerging markets. This strategy has proved very favorable for me because year to date the emerging market fund has appreciated double digits while all other funds have appreciated no more than 4.2%. That being said, financial experts always suggest that you review and rebalance your portfolio so that it has the correct percentages in the investments you want them to be in.

There are four major categories for the funds in my 401(k) plan: Capital Preservation, Income, Balanced, and Growth. Each has their own different benchmark but the majority of my funds are in those that seek to match various broad market indicides. The big three for me are emerging markets, a small cap fund, and an equity index fund which matches the S&P 500 index.

Fund Category Percent Benchmark
International Bond Income, Bonds 0.00084% Citigroup World Government Bond Index
Equity Index Growth, Stocks 19.97% S&P 500 Index
International Equity Growth, Stocks 8.4% Morgan Stanley Capital International EAFE
Small Cap Growth, Stocks 17.56% Russell 2000 Index
Emerging Market Equity Growth, Stocks 23.4% Morgan Stanley Capital International Emerging Markets Free Index
Company Growth, Stocks 4.79% N/A
Brokerage Growth, Stocks 25.7% N/A

Portfolio Allocation

From the table and fancy Excel pie chart, I’m heavily invested in stocks and a high proportion of it (nearly a quarter) is in the emerging markets. I am tempted to shift a little from all the funds into an income fund based on U.S. equities but it seems like such a uber-conservative move for someone at my age. With the speed at which emerging markets are moving, it seems like a mistake to move money out of that fund even though risk diversification is the name of the game – landmark studies have shown that asset allocation has a huge impact on returns.

Even if you don’t plan on making changes to the allocation, it’s always good to be aware of how you’re spread around. Right now, I won’t be making any changes> but in the future I think I may move some of my equity funds and small cap funds into something that relies more on dividends for appreciation instead of price movement.

{ 4 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts


RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

4 Responses to “Reviewing and Rebalancing Your Portfolio”

  1. muckdog says:

    I think this is a good idea. Asset allocation and diversification are what it’s all about, but without periodic rebalancing things can get out of whack. Of course, I have some friends who bought Apple stock and have seen it go up 500% and they haven’t rebalanced yet. Something to be said about letting your winners run. (I’d rebalance if it were me, though).

  2. jim says:

    With funds in a 401(k) where there are no costs to rebalance and where you don’t know exactly what stocks the funds hold, it makes more sense. When you’re talking about a single stock, the decisions are less cut and dry because there are more factors to consider.

    Your friends’ decision to hold Apple make sense if the reasons they bought the stock still hold true and it’s nice to let winners run, it’s a solid long term strategy. However, they might find themselves with a lot more tech than they originally planned (if that was even their plan) and want to diversify to lower the risk. Risk is good if you’re potentially getting enough reward for it, the rewards I’ve received from emerging markets funds has been worth the risk and volatility.

    One thing they might want to consider is selling Apple to offset losses so they can get themselves out of a bad position.

  3. Happy New Year!
    Just a quick note to wish you all a Happy New Year! No major resolutions for me this year. Just a couple of things that we have to get in order… First off, we still need to put together an estate plan. We’re currently living with wills tha…

  4. Seven Steps to Start 2006 on the Right Financial Foot

    Here’s a resolution-related article from Dallas/Ft. Worth Texas fee-only financial planner Steve Blankenship titled Seven Steps to Start 2006 on the Right Financial Foot. I’m posting a summary as well as links to posts written on corresponding topic…


Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy


Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2014 by www.Bargaineering.com. All rights reserved.