<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roth IRA As An Emergency Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-343482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-343482</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Ed, it always goes back to the person. Take an ethical person and put them in a dishonest situation, they&#039;ll still make the right decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Ed, it always goes back to the person. Take an ethical person and put them in a dishonest situation, they&#8217;ll still make the right decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-343473</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-343473</guid>
		<description>I know this is late (7 months after the last comment) but I was directed here through a link.  

My question is how do the fee-based planners get off trying to come across as holier than thou?  First off, from an insurance stand point, if a fee-only planner sells a policy they will still receive a commission.  Apart from one or two companies, the &quot;fee-only planner&quot; will get paid twice on insurance business.  Charging the hourly rate is a ridiculous way increase ones compensation in regards to insurance planning.

Second, fee-based planners make MUCH more on investments than commission only sales reps.  The charge a fee (typically .5% to 1.5%) EACH YEAR on assets under management.  This is on top of the operating costs that the mutual fund company charges.  Now if individual stocks are used the client can avoid that, but all stock portfolios are rare these days.

Finally, anyone the degrades designations such as CLU and ChFC probably does not know much about the accreditation process.  I was surprised the read this comment from Mr. MBA, CFP, CPA, etc.  Most with their CLU are qualified to sit for the CFP exam based on their course work to get the CLU.  Those with a ChFC have taken the course work even farther.  I would trust a CLU/ChFC over a MBA/CPA any day when it comes to financial planning.

Bottom line is that it is not about the products or the way the planner gets compensated that creates the problem.  It is the planner.  Unethical people exist in all worlds.  Saying that a commission only life insurance agent that sells a lot of whole life is inherently bad because the product is &quot;no good&quot; or &quot;never needed&quot; is the approach of an ignorant person that is just trying to justify his existence in his profession by degrading others because of a lack of confidence in his own integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is late (7 months after the last comment) but I was directed here through a link.  </p>
<p>My question is how do the fee-based planners get off trying to come across as holier than thou?  First off, from an insurance stand point, if a fee-only planner sells a policy they will still receive a commission.  Apart from one or two companies, the &#8220;fee-only planner&#8221; will get paid twice on insurance business.  Charging the hourly rate is a ridiculous way increase ones compensation in regards to insurance planning.</p>
<p>Second, fee-based planners make MUCH more on investments than commission only sales reps.  The charge a fee (typically .5% to 1.5%) EACH YEAR on assets under management.  This is on top of the operating costs that the mutual fund company charges.  Now if individual stocks are used the client can avoid that, but all stock portfolios are rare these days.</p>
<p>Finally, anyone the degrades designations such as CLU and ChFC probably does not know much about the accreditation process.  I was surprised the read this comment from Mr. MBA, CFP, CPA, etc.  Most with their CLU are qualified to sit for the CFP exam based on their course work to get the CLU.  Those with a ChFC have taken the course work even farther.  I would trust a CLU/ChFC over a MBA/CPA any day when it comes to financial planning.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that it is not about the products or the way the planner gets compensated that creates the problem.  It is the planner.  Unethical people exist in all worlds.  Saying that a commission only life insurance agent that sells a lot of whole life is inherently bad because the product is &#8220;no good&#8221; or &#8220;never needed&#8221; is the approach of an ignorant person that is just trying to justify his existence in his profession by degrading others because of a lack of confidence in his own integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-327061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-327061</guid>
		<description>Researching Cash Rich Dividend Paying Whole Life Policies which seem to be the topic here versus Roth IRA’s. It would be nice if Mr. Financial Planner Dude would research and compare the two instead of just defending Roth IRA’s. I am a school teacher and there seems to be no comparison. Dividend Whole Life seems to be safer, richer, smarter and beats an IRA in every area except for maybe when a fund is matched by the employer. Even then the 50% fees charged over the life of 401K’s kills that advantage. (60 minutes special on 401K’s) This lady – Pamela Yellen even has a $100,000 challenge on her website to anyone who can find a better retirement vehicle. So maybe the financial expert can tell us why 401K’s set up by our faithful government are better. Take your head out of the sand, stop being offended and give us some facts. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researching Cash Rich Dividend Paying Whole Life Policies which seem to be the topic here versus Roth IRA’s. It would be nice if Mr. Financial Planner Dude would research and compare the two instead of just defending Roth IRA’s. I am a school teacher and there seems to be no comparison. Dividend Whole Life seems to be safer, richer, smarter and beats an IRA in every area except for maybe when a fund is matched by the employer. Even then the 50% fees charged over the life of 401K’s kills that advantage. (60 minutes special on 401K’s) This lady – Pamela Yellen even has a $100,000 challenge on her website to anyone who can find a better retirement vehicle. So maybe the financial expert can tell us why 401K’s set up by our faithful government are better. Take your head out of the sand, stop being offended and give us some facts. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-327060</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-327060</guid>
		<description>Researching Cash Rich Dividend Paying Whole Life Policies which seem to be the topic here versus Roth IRA&#039;s.  It would be nice if Mr. Financial Planner Dude would research and compare the two instead of just defending Roth IRA&#039;s.  I am a school teacher and there seems to be no comparison.  Dividend Whole Life seems to be safer, richer, smarter and beats an IRA in every area except for maybe when a fund is matched by the employer.  Even then the 50% fees charged over the life of 401K&#039;s kills that advantage.  (60 minutes special on 401K&#039;s)  This lady - Pamela Yellen even has a $100,000 challenge on her website to anyone who can find a better retirement vehicle.  So maybe the financial expert can tell us why 401K&#039;s set up by our faithful government are better. Take your head out of the sand, stop being offended and give us some facts.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researching Cash Rich Dividend Paying Whole Life Policies which seem to be the topic here versus Roth IRA&#8217;s.  It would be nice if Mr. Financial Planner Dude would research and compare the two instead of just defending Roth IRA&#8217;s.  I am a school teacher and there seems to be no comparison.  Dividend Whole Life seems to be safer, richer, smarter and beats an IRA in every area except for maybe when a fund is matched by the employer.  Even then the 50% fees charged over the life of 401K&#8217;s kills that advantage.  (60 minutes special on 401K&#8217;s)  This lady &#8211; Pamela Yellen even has a $100,000 challenge on her website to anyone who can find a better retirement vehicle.  So maybe the financial expert can tell us why 401K&#8217;s set up by our faithful government are better. Take your head out of the sand, stop being offended and give us some facts.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-308828</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-308828</guid>
		<description>It is a terrible idea to withdraw contributions from your Roth IRA!! Unless you are in dire need, you are hurting yourself in the long run because that money won&#039;t continue to grow for your retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a terrible idea to withdraw contributions from your Roth IRA!! Unless you are in dire need, you are hurting yourself in the long run because that money won&#8217;t continue to grow for your retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-290513</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-290513</guid>
		<description>rose, 

that article actually makes no sense.  The math is completely wrong.  His theory is that while you save x dollars in taxes you will eventually pay x+y dollars in retirement where y is the taxes on the extra money you made. While that is true, if you dont save in a tax deffered or other retirement vehicle you not only miss saving out on X dollars in taxes you still pay x+y in the end.  So

tax deffered = x+y
non tax deferred = 2x+y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rose, </p>
<p>that article actually makes no sense.  The math is completely wrong.  His theory is that while you save x dollars in taxes you will eventually pay x+y dollars in retirement where y is the taxes on the extra money you made. While that is true, if you dont save in a tax deffered or other retirement vehicle you not only miss saving out on X dollars in taxes you still pay x+y in the end.  So</p>
<p>tax deffered = x+y<br />
non tax deferred = 2x+y</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanna</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-160623</link>
		<dc:creator>joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-160623</guid>
		<description>Sorry. I didn&#039;t read the whole thing. But anyone can answer my question, I appreciate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I didn&#8217;t read the whole thing. But anyone can answer my question, I appreciate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joanna</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-160613</link>
		<dc:creator>joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-160613</guid>
		<description>When I requested to take out my contributions from Roth IRA after 5 years, my advisor said that they had to charge 5% commissions because of the investment choice I made. Am I supposed to pay the deferred commissions if I have to take out money from Roth IRA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I requested to take out my contributions from Roth IRA after 5 years, my advisor said that they had to charge 5% commissions because of the investment choice I made. Am I supposed to pay the deferred commissions if I have to take out money from Roth IRA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-92324</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-92324</guid>
		<description>To those of you arguing that you will save more on taxes in a tax-deferred account than you will eventually pay, here is a very interesting article on the subject, which I found pretty eye-opening!

Qualified plans ‑‑ the &#039;grand illusion&#039; 
http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/tcj/2006/jul/i.htm

(Note that this is not a financial website, though I don&#039;t know much about the author of the article, but he brings up some very interesting points.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those of you arguing that you will save more on taxes in a tax-deferred account than you will eventually pay, here is a very interesting article on the subject, which I found pretty eye-opening!</p>
<p>Qualified plans ‑‑ the &#8216;grand illusion&#8217;<br />
<a href="http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/tcj/2006/jul/i.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/tcj/2006/jul/i.htm</a></p>
<p>(Note that this is not a financial website, though I don&#8217;t know much about the author of the article, but he brings up some very interesting points.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-61207</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-61207</guid>
		<description>Uriel - 

There are several things that Ms. Yellen says to look for in a Whole Life policy/company - Direct vs. Non-direct recognition, riders, etc.   

Can you recommend a few companies and products that would work well with the Bank on Yourself concept?

Thank you, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uriel &#8211; </p>
<p>There are several things that Ms. Yellen says to look for in a Whole Life policy/company &#8211; Direct vs. Non-direct recognition, riders, etc.   </p>
<p>Can you recommend a few companies and products that would work well with the Bank on Yourself concept?</p>
<p>Thank you, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-49725</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-49725</guid>
		<description>Jim, I totally agree with you I was sitting at my computer with steam coming out of my ears when I was reading what Mr. Acevedo was saying it is absolutely insane that we have these people out there leaching off of the very people they should be trying to protect.  I think it is amazing how one person can take common sense and flip it around to make it seem like it is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I totally agree with you I was sitting at my computer with steam coming out of my ears when I was reading what Mr. Acevedo was saying it is absolutely insane that we have these people out there leaching off of the very people they should be trying to protect.  I think it is amazing how one person can take common sense and flip it around to make it seem like it is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ -Learning Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-24167</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ -Learning Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-24167</guid>
		<description>Jim, 
Ahh all of those wonderful credentials, I was just recently ripped off by a fee based planner espousing the fee only approach. (Mine had the alphabet soup of credentials, too)  My challenge is put your $$ or your malpractice policy where your mouth is. Prove your 8-10% and pay me the difference if you fail. 

At least with a traditonal whole life contract you get  contractual guarantees backed up by a regulated insurance company  (I&#039;d like to see you put your net worth up against theirs) and your beneficiaries get a  tax free death benefit.  Dont be so quick to knock  others, any 3rd grader can do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
Ahh all of those wonderful credentials, I was just recently ripped off by a fee based planner espousing the fee only approach. (Mine had the alphabet soup of credentials, too)  My challenge is put your $$ or your malpractice policy where your mouth is. Prove your 8-10% and pay me the difference if you fail. </p>
<p>At least with a traditonal whole life contract you get  contractual guarantees backed up by a regulated insurance company  (I&#8217;d like to see you put your net worth up against theirs) and your beneficiaries get a  tax free death benefit.  Dont be so quick to knock  others, any 3rd grader can do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-20667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-20667</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[FYI - This &quot;Jim&quot; is not the same Jim as the author of this site]&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry, mis-clicked before I finished ... now where was I? Oh yeah,

Visit a fee-only Certified Financial Planner (TM) practitioner who will give you the facts on these schemes. Pay him/her an hourly rate and you will keep your wealth working for you and not a salesman. Stay realistic, stay reasonable, stay away from scams, and you will get rich slowly and retire comfortably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[FYI - This "Jim" is not the same Jim as the author of this site]</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, mis-clicked before I finished &#8230; now where was I? Oh yeah,</p>
<p>Visit a fee-only Certified Financial Planner (TM) practitioner who will give you the facts on these schemes. Pay him/her an hourly rate and you will keep your wealth working for you and not a salesman. Stay realistic, stay reasonable, stay away from scams, and you will get rich slowly and retire comfortably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-20666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-20666</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[FYI - This &quot;Jim&quot; is not the same Jim as the author of this site]&lt;/strong&gt;

As a fee-only CPA, MBA and CFP (TM) I am appalled at the effort put into this discourse by Mr. Acevedo regarding Bank On Yourself POLICIES (yes, these are insurance policies). As any informed adult is aware, whole life insurance policies are sold, and not bought, and this is simply another scheme to sell whole life insurance and enrich the salesperson.

Mr. Kindall: a &quot;lens&quot; is a term coined by the self-promotional &quot;Squidoo&quot; site Mr. Acevedo invites his prey to visit. And you are correct sir: this concept is &quot;completely full of BS&quot; and they are &quot;trying to sell something.&quot; Something that the majority of us simply do not need: a whole life insurance policy that does nothing more than siphon assets from productive, tax-saving saving and investment opportunities into the coffers and pockets of big insurance companies and their salesforce.

&quot;If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.&quot;  Warning signs: 1) the salesperson has no meaningful credentials other than insurance industry education (CLU, ChFC); 2) the salesperson is commission-based and not FEE-ONLY; 3) this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that the mainstream financial advisor community is too uninformed and ill-educated to pick up on, but YOU, yes only YOU, can be the smart one and get into this private club with your secret password and then gain access to the protected, for-your-eyes-only special report (I&#039;m getting ill); 4) of course let&#039;s bring in tax saving opportunities and mis-represent conventional retirement planning as &quot;only tax deferred.&quot;

The facts are that two plus two actually do equal four. Mr. Acevedo is promoting a scheme that will entice you into purchasing a whole life insurance contract (and yes, Virginia, term-life is cheaper and better ... look up Low Load). You will then put your capital to work by borrowing against your home (going into debt) to in effect take your equity from one pocket and put it into another. The problem is that Mr. Acevedo and his cohorts will be dipping into that other pocket to help themselves to ever-higher insurance premium payments.

Yes, you can safely make 8-10% annual returns long-term. Yes, most retirement plan investments are &quot;only&quot; tax deferred BUT THAT IS THE BEAUTY: tax deferral means you have use of the money and not the Federal government who will only spend it (and certainly Mr. Acevedo will not have it to buy more gas for his Porsche). There is a wonderful mathematical concept that these salesmen conveniently avoid: the TIME VALUE OF MONEY. The money that you tax defer is at work for you making far more in LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAINS (which are taxed at a maximum of 15%) than you will ever, ever pay out in taxes. Plus you get company matches, plus Roth IRA&#039;s grow tax free forever (including in the hands of your heirs), plus .... oh I could go on for hours... I am steaming.

This is nothing more than a get rich quick scheme, and the person getting rich is Mr. Acevedo. Do yourselves a big favor and schedule a free, one hour initial consultation with a FEE-ONLY CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[FYI - This "Jim" is not the same Jim as the author of this site]</strong></p>
<p>As a fee-only CPA, MBA and CFP (TM) I am appalled at the effort put into this discourse by Mr. Acevedo regarding Bank On Yourself POLICIES (yes, these are insurance policies). As any informed adult is aware, whole life insurance policies are sold, and not bought, and this is simply another scheme to sell whole life insurance and enrich the salesperson.</p>
<p>Mr. Kindall: a &#8220;lens&#8221; is a term coined by the self-promotional &#8220;Squidoo&#8221; site Mr. Acevedo invites his prey to visit. And you are correct sir: this concept is &#8220;completely full of BS&#8221; and they are &#8220;trying to sell something.&#8221; Something that the majority of us simply do not need: a whole life insurance policy that does nothing more than siphon assets from productive, tax-saving saving and investment opportunities into the coffers and pockets of big insurance companies and their salesforce.</p>
<p>&#8220;If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.&#8221;  Warning signs: 1) the salesperson has no meaningful credentials other than insurance industry education (CLU, ChFC); 2) the salesperson is commission-based and not FEE-ONLY; 3) this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that the mainstream financial advisor community is too uninformed and ill-educated to pick up on, but YOU, yes only YOU, can be the smart one and get into this private club with your secret password and then gain access to the protected, for-your-eyes-only special report (I&#8217;m getting ill); 4) of course let&#8217;s bring in tax saving opportunities and mis-represent conventional retirement planning as &#8220;only tax deferred.&#8221;</p>
<p>The facts are that two plus two actually do equal four. Mr. Acevedo is promoting a scheme that will entice you into purchasing a whole life insurance contract (and yes, Virginia, term-life is cheaper and better &#8230; look up Low Load). You will then put your capital to work by borrowing against your home (going into debt) to in effect take your equity from one pocket and put it into another. The problem is that Mr. Acevedo and his cohorts will be dipping into that other pocket to help themselves to ever-higher insurance premium payments.</p>
<p>Yes, you can safely make 8-10% annual returns long-term. Yes, most retirement plan investments are &#8220;only&#8221; tax deferred BUT THAT IS THE BEAUTY: tax deferral means you have use of the money and not the Federal government who will only spend it (and certainly Mr. Acevedo will not have it to buy more gas for his Porsche). There is a wonderful mathematical concept that these salesmen conveniently avoid: the TIME VALUE OF MONEY. The money that you tax defer is at work for you making far more in LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAINS (which are taxed at a maximum of 15%) than you will ever, ever pay out in taxes. Plus you get company matches, plus Roth IRA&#8217;s grow tax free forever (including in the hands of your heirs), plus &#8230;. oh I could go on for hours&#8230; I am steaming.</p>
<p>This is nothing more than a get rich quick scheme, and the person getting rich is Mr. Acevedo. Do yourselves a big favor and schedule a free, one hour initial consultation with a FEE-ONLY CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Uriel Acevedo</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html/comment-page-1#comment-14868</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Uriel Acevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/roth-ira-as-an-emergency-fund.html#comment-14868</guid>
		<description>To Random Skeptic (and my apologies to all who have already read about this before):

Might I respectfully suggest in the future you take the time to read all previous posts prior to submitting a post? 

The previous posts above should have been enough to clarify your confusion; however in view of your incomprehension here I go again…

Bank on Yourself(TM) is a financial strategy offered to the general public by way of our radio ads and other marketing venues. 

It is ALSO offered to the Financial Planning/Insurance industry as an alternative planning system that may be incorporated into their practice.

Only HIGHLY trained and EXPERIENCED Financial Planners and Insurance agents qualify to become Bank on Yourself(TM) Certified Advisors. Most of our current advisors have more than 20 years of Professional Financial Planning experience and most possess advanced degrees such as CPF(TM), MBA, CPA, ChFC and CLU (myself being one of the rare exceptions to this fact- I only have 6 years experience in the industry). 

The radio ads ARE MOST CERTAINLY NOT designed to get anyone to &quot;become an insurance agent&quot;. They are designed to bring to light one very simple fact being ignored by the entire Financial Planning industry, and that is: the LACK OF CAPITALIZATION is the crux to ALL financial disarray. 

I would like to advise you to go to the website you were directed to in the radio ad you heard; and enter the pass code provided to you- this will allow you to download an INVALUABLE report outlining the concept (I PROMISE there will be no information advising you to become an insurance agent!).

For another detailed overview of this strategy, provided by a Infinite Banking/Bank on Yourself(TM) CLIENT you may visit the following link which is also available on my lens:

http://www.infinitebanking.info/IBC%20-%20How%20It%20Works.pdf

There are no pop-ups, sales or gimmicks- JUST PLAIN, GOOD, SIMPLE and LIFE CHANGING information.

I hope this helps your confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Random Skeptic (and my apologies to all who have already read about this before):</p>
<p>Might I respectfully suggest in the future you take the time to read all previous posts prior to submitting a post? </p>
<p>The previous posts above should have been enough to clarify your confusion; however in view of your incomprehension here I go again…</p>
<p>Bank on Yourself(TM) is a financial strategy offered to the general public by way of our radio ads and other marketing venues. </p>
<p>It is ALSO offered to the Financial Planning/Insurance industry as an alternative planning system that may be incorporated into their practice.</p>
<p>Only HIGHLY trained and EXPERIENCED Financial Planners and Insurance agents qualify to become Bank on Yourself(TM) Certified Advisors. Most of our current advisors have more than 20 years of Professional Financial Planning experience and most possess advanced degrees such as CPF(TM), MBA, CPA, ChFC and CLU (myself being one of the rare exceptions to this fact- I only have 6 years experience in the industry). </p>
<p>The radio ads ARE MOST CERTAINLY NOT designed to get anyone to &#8220;become an insurance agent&#8221;. They are designed to bring to light one very simple fact being ignored by the entire Financial Planning industry, and that is: the LACK OF CAPITALIZATION is the crux to ALL financial disarray. </p>
<p>I would like to advise you to go to the website you were directed to in the radio ad you heard; and enter the pass code provided to you- this will allow you to download an INVALUABLE report outlining the concept (I PROMISE there will be no information advising you to become an insurance agent!).</p>
<p>For another detailed overview of this strategy, provided by a Infinite Banking/Bank on Yourself(TM) CLIENT you may visit the following link which is also available on my lens:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infinitebanking.info/IBC%20-%20How%20It%20Works.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.infinitebanking.info/IBC%20-%20How%20It%20Works.pdf</a></p>
<p>There are no pop-ups, sales or gimmicks- JUST PLAIN, GOOD, SIMPLE and LIFE CHANGING information.</p>
<p>I hope this helps your confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

