<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You E-File?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Strebkr</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html/comment-page-1#comment-364229</link>
		<dc:creator>Strebkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=800#comment-364229</guid>
		<description>Fast forward to 2011.... Paid tax preparers are now required to e-file all returns. Individuals are the only ones allowed to paper file. I bet in a few years they will pull the plug on that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast forward to 2011&#8230;. Paid tax preparers are now required to e-file all returns. Individuals are the only ones allowed to paper file. I bet in a few years they will pull the plug on that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html/comment-page-1#comment-4613</link>
		<dc:creator>Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=800#comment-4613</guid>
		<description>Anyone know WHY they charge for e-filing?  Seems to me, they should prefer it because it automates more of the process, hence making it cheaper for the government...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know WHY they charge for e-filing?  Seems to me, they should prefer it because it automates more of the process, hence making it cheaper for the government&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html/comment-page-1#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=800#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>The speed and minimizing the chance of government bungling do it for me.  I wonder if people on direct deposit for S.S. have to recieve a return by direct deposit since they already do for their S.S. money.  Makes sense to me, but this is the federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed and minimizing the chance of government bungling do it for me.  I wonder if people on direct deposit for S.S. have to recieve a return by direct deposit since they already do for their S.S. money.  Makes sense to me, but this is the federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayfer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/should-you-e-file.html/comment-page-1#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=800#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Peace of mind...my sentiments exactly.  I e-filed with TurboTax, and it cost $14.95, not $10.  But I got my refund (direct deposit) 2 weeks later.  So, I&#039;m generally happy with my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peace of mind&#8230;my sentiments exactly.  I e-filed with TurboTax, and it cost $14.95, not $10.  But I got my refund (direct deposit) 2 weeks later.  So, I&#8217;m generally happy with my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

