<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Picking Strategy: Dogs of the Dow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:04:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CreditShack</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-59408</link>
		<dc:creator>CreditShack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 04:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-59408</guid>
		<description>Motley Fool quit the &quot;Foolish Four&quot; method (which involved buying Dogs of the Dow stocks 2 through 5) because they attracted so much attention to the strategy that it quit working.

Backtesting shows that the Dogs of the Dow strategy beat the DJIA.  I&#039;d be interested in knowing if buying the Dogs of the Dow in year 1 and then holding them permanently, instead of rebalancing annually, beat the Dogs strategy.  Rarely does a trading strategy beat a sound buy-and-hold strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motley Fool quit the &#8220;Foolish Four&#8221; method (which involved buying Dogs of the Dow stocks 2 through 5) because they attracted so much attention to the strategy that it quit working.</p>
<p>Backtesting shows that the Dogs of the Dow strategy beat the DJIA.  I&#8217;d be interested in knowing if buying the Dogs of the Dow in year 1 and then holding them permanently, instead of rebalancing annually, beat the Dogs strategy.  Rarely does a trading strategy beat a sound buy-and-hold strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-58613</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-58613</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weekly Roundup - 01/12/07&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#8217;s a quick look at some of the personal finance related articles that caught my eye over the past week&#8230; 

Jim profiles the &#8220;Dogs of the Dow&#8221; stock picking strategy.
Flexo thinks that we should forget about &#8220;The Latte F...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekly Roundup &#8211; 01/12/07</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick look at some of the personal finance related articles that caught my eye over the past week&#8230; </p>
<p>Jim profiles the &#8220;Dogs of the Dow&#8221; stock picking strategy.<br />
Flexo thinks that we should forget about &#8220;The Latte F&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-58428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-58428</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t pick stocks.  I think mutual funds, primarily low expense ratio, no load index funds are better than most stock picking &quot;strategies&quot; I might use.  You&#039;re guaranteed market returns that way, they&#039;re tax efficient when you&#039;re investing in non-retirement accounts, and it takes absolutely zero time and effort to &quot;research&quot; and &quot;manage&quot; my portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t pick stocks.  I think mutual funds, primarily low expense ratio, no load index funds are better than most stock picking &#8220;strategies&#8221; I might use.  You&#8217;re guaranteed market returns that way, they&#8217;re tax efficient when you&#8217;re investing in non-retirement accounts, and it takes absolutely zero time and effort to &#8220;research&#8221; and &#8220;manage&#8221; my portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: young</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57506</link>
		<dc:creator>young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57506</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...stick with value investing for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;stick with value investing for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57282</guid>
		<description>I do take in consideration the dogs of the dow strategy.  I look at which companies are in the dogs list and study them.  I tend to choose from them if I do believe they are financially solid. 

I do not invest blindly on them... but I do consider them as good candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do take in consideration the dogs of the dow strategy.  I look at which companies are in the dogs list and study them.  I tend to choose from them if I do believe they are financially solid. </p>
<p>I do not invest blindly on them&#8230; but I do consider them as good candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57250</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Money Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57250</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Star Money Articles for the Week of Jan. 8&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Consumerism Commentary is covering the US News Annual Investing Guide. AllFinancialMatters details the phaseouts for tax benefits. MightyBargainHunter lists 16 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Star Money Articles for the Week of Jan. 8</strong></p>
<p>Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Consumerism Commentary is covering the US News Annual Investing Guide. AllFinancialMatters details the phaseouts for tax benefits. MightyBargainHunter lists 16 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MillionDollarJourney.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57189</link>
		<dc:creator>MillionDollarJourney.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57189</guid>
		<description>Jim,  if you are interested in buying dividend based stocks, pick strong companies that have a history of increasing their dividends annually.  Stingy Finance has an article on this: http://www.stingyfinance.com/beat-the-market-with-dividend-paying-stocks.htm

Best of luck!

FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,  if you are interested in buying dividend based stocks, pick strong companies that have a history of increasing their dividends annually.  Stingy Finance has an article on this: <a href="http://www.stingyfinance.com/beat-the-market-with-dividend-paying-stocks.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.stingyfinance.com/beat-the-market-with-dividend-paying-stocks.htm</a></p>
<p>Best of luck!</p>
<p>FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57183</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57183</guid>
		<description>What disciplines do you follow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What disciplines do you follow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeefStooge</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html/comment-page-1#comment-57118</link>
		<dc:creator>BeefStooge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/stock-picking-strategy-dogs-of-the-dow.html#comment-57118</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the Motley Fool promote this strategy a while back (mid to late nineties)?  I followed it for a while, and if I recall they ended up ditching it because there was some issue with the calculation of the return rates.  I&#039;m probably completely wrong, but I seem to remember this or something like it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the Motley Fool promote this strategy a while back (mid to late nineties)?  I followed it for a while, and if I recall they ended up ditching it because there was some issue with the calculation of the return rates.  I&#8217;m probably completely wrong, but I seem to remember this or something like it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
