<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tenancy In Common Unforseen Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-11199</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=224#comment-11199</guid>
		<description>This article neglects to mention than tenancy in common doesn&#039;t have to be 50-50. Owners can divide their shares however they want. I recommend visiting Wikipedia.com for definitions of different types of titles. Also NOLO.com offers do-it-yourself legal forms for unequal ownership of a house. You can start with those and then have a lawyer review them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article neglects to mention than tenancy in common doesn&#8217;t have to be 50-50. Owners can divide their shares however they want. I recommend visiting Wikipedia.com for definitions of different types of titles. Also NOLO.com offers do-it-yourself legal forms for unequal ownership of a house. You can start with those and then have a lawyer review them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=224#comment-656</guid>
		<description>I was in this situation a few years ago-- bought with a partner, 50/50, then we split up at a point where the value of the apartment had increased a lot. Fortunately things worked out because my ex refinanced and with some help from a parent, was able to buy me out and stay in the apartment. But it was an emotional minefield, and tempting as it is to want to share housing costs, I would not do it again. Or if I did, I would do it with some sort of pre-nuptial agreement about how things would be handled in the event of a breakup. Even if it&#039;s just friends, better to lay everything out in a contract beforehand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in this situation a few years ago&#8211; bought with a partner, 50/50, then we split up at a point where the value of the apartment had increased a lot. Fortunately things worked out because my ex refinanced and with some help from a parent, was able to buy me out and stay in the apartment. But it was an emotional minefield, and tempting as it is to want to share housing costs, I would not do it again. Or if I did, I would do it with some sort of pre-nuptial agreement about how things would be handled in the event of a breakup. Even if it&#8217;s just friends, better to lay everything out in a contract beforehand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=224#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Yes, definitely get a lease written up so you both know exactly what you expect from each other. Plus, if he seriously accidentally (or purposefully) screws something up, you are protected.

If he rents from you, then it wouldn&#039;t be a tenancy in common, it would just be you owning it and him being a renter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, definitely get a lease written up so you both know exactly what you expect from each other. Plus, if he seriously accidentally (or purposefully) screws something up, you are protected.</p>
<p>If he rents from you, then it wouldn&#8217;t be a tenancy in common, it would just be you owning it and him being a renter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/tenancy-in-common-unforseen-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=224#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Exactly what my roommate and I are discussing.  I feel that I should front all of the money and he will jsut pay rent to me so that when I want to sell I can and do all the repairs myself unless he f&#039;s something up.  Should I write up a lease agreement anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what my roommate and I are discussing.  I feel that I should front all of the money and he will jsut pay rent to me so that when I want to sell I can and do all the repairs myself unless he f&#8217;s something up.  Should I write up a lease agreement anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

