<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 Year Stock Market Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:50:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-224825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html#comment-224825</guid>
		<description>I agree with Bumbo.  If you are set to retire or are retired, you need to put a portion of your funds in equities or you run the risk of running out of money.  

Also I am saving for another home, not sure when this will happen, but the money I have is deducted from a savings account to a balanced fund.  This way it is a little &quot;safer&quot; than just investing 100% in stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bumbo.  If you are set to retire or are retired, you need to put a portion of your funds in equities or you run the risk of running out of money.  </p>
<p>Also I am saving for another home, not sure when this will happen, but the money I have is deducted from a savings account to a balanced fund.  This way it is a little &#8220;safer&#8221; than just investing 100% in stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron@TheWisdomJournal</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-211018</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron@TheWisdomJournal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html#comment-211018</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil is here!!

Love the book, man! It&#039;s helped me make a lot of money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil is here!!</p>
<p>Love the book, man! It&#8217;s helped me make a lot of money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bumbo</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-210894</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html#comment-210894</guid>
		<description>In fact, someone with a house-buying fund is in a tighter spot than a nearing retiree, since you&#039;ll need all of your money at the time of purchase.  The retiree wants the money to last the rest of his lifetime, so can (and should) leave money in equities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, someone with a house-buying fund is in a tighter spot than a nearing retiree, since you&#8217;ll need all of your money at the time of purchase.  The retiree wants the money to last the rest of his lifetime, so can (and should) leave money in equities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-210874</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html#comment-210874</guid>
		<description>While it is true that one should always look at investing in good companies with a time frame of at least 3 - 5 years, it&#039;s always good to remember some other points:

- Never buy tickers; always buy companies
- Remember that you&#039;re not buying the market, per se; you&#039;re buying businesses
- After investing in a good company, stop watching day-to-day market activity; after all, if you&#039;ve invested well, you don&#039;t have to worry about the overall market (for the purposes of having a good investment)

All of this hinges on the Two Golden Rules of Money (was it Warren Buffett or some other financial guru who came up with this?):

- Rule Number One: Don&#039;t lose money
- Rule Number Two: Never forget Rule Number One

In a down market in which you&#039;re already invested, if pulling out of a stock based on some irrational fear of what the market is going to do causes you to run against Rule Number One, then don&#039;t do it (makes decision making all the more easier, no?).

I follow a specific stock recommendation service, so it&#039;s easy for me to figure out which companies are better for my investing. This way, I stand a better chance of having better investments, regardless of how much time and energy I put into my portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is true that one should always look at investing in good companies with a time frame of at least 3 &#8211; 5 years, it&#8217;s always good to remember some other points:</p>
<p>- Never buy tickers; always buy companies<br />
- Remember that you&#8217;re not buying the market, per se; you&#8217;re buying businesses<br />
- After investing in a good company, stop watching day-to-day market activity; after all, if you&#8217;ve invested well, you don&#8217;t have to worry about the overall market (for the purposes of having a good investment)</p>
<p>All of this hinges on the Two Golden Rules of Money (was it Warren Buffett or some other financial guru who came up with this?):</p>
<p>- Rule Number One: Don&#8217;t lose money<br />
- Rule Number Two: Never forget Rule Number One</p>
<p>In a down market in which you&#8217;re already invested, if pulling out of a stock based on some irrational fear of what the market is going to do causes you to run against Rule Number One, then don&#8217;t do it (makes decision making all the more easier, no?).</p>
<p>I follow a specific stock recommendation service, so it&#8217;s easy for me to figure out which companies are better for my investing. This way, I stand a better chance of having better investments, regardless of how much time and energy I put into my portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html/comment-page-1#comment-210866</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/the-5-year-stock-market-rule.html#comment-210866</guid>
		<description>I definitely use this rule.  I don&#039;t have a hard 5-year rule (what happens if I plan to buy a house in 5 years, 6 months?), but I think about how much I need for short-term goals like paying for business school and how much remains to be invested in taxable accounts.

I hear the 5-year rule a lot, but I&#039;ve also heard that any needs within the next 7 or even 10 years should be saved outside of the stock market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely use this rule.  I don&#8217;t have a hard 5-year rule (what happens if I plan to buy a house in 5 years, 6 months?), but I think about how much I need for short-term goals like paying for business school and how much remains to be invested in taxable accounts.</p>
<p>I hear the 5-year rule a lot, but I&#8217;ve also heard that any needs within the next 7 or even 10 years should be saved outside of the stock market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
