<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United First Financial Money Merge Accounts: Scam or Legit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:29:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NJB82</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-331754</link>
		<dc:creator>NJB82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-331754</guid>
		<description>St. Nick,

(Merry Christmas. I&#039;ve been good - can I have a Bentley now?)

Another option is Excel, some cool examples of which are at vertex42 dot com.  Look under Extra Payments.  You could charge clients $350/year to manage the process and they&#039;d be ahead by a few years and a few hundred bucks over MMA.  Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. Nick,</p>
<p>(Merry Christmas. I&#8217;ve been good &#8211; can I have a Bentley now?)</p>
<p>Another option is Excel, some cool examples of which are at vertex42 dot com.  Look under Extra Payments.  You could charge clients $350/year to manage the process and they&#8217;d be ahead by a few years and a few hundred bucks over MMA.  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeTaxpayer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-331747</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeTaxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-331747</guid>
		<description>Nick -
MMA assumes the extra funds are available as well, of course it only works with the money the user has. If my user (of my free spreadsheet, or of nothing) does have the $200 one month, neither does the MMA user. 
The reliance on an equity line as emergency fund doesn&#039;t require MMA, anyone can do this. To be sure, it&#039;s not recommended either way, but there&#039;s no magic to the MMA user having that available. 

Congrats on the SAT, if that&#039;s the case. Usually those who do that have a certain personality, a bit more black and white, and a bit too logical, almost to a fault. We usually don&#039;t fall for nonsense like this. 

By the way, the user with all the other debt should focus on paying that debt off, highest rate first. It makes little sense to throw $3500 to this software when the algorithm is so simple. &quot;Pay all account&#039;s minimums, and send any extra funds to the highest interest rate debt.&quot; 

You do get points for your paragraphs, though. We find many agents going off on incoherent rants with no structure. Your points are well presented, even though I dispute the validity of each and every one.

I&#039;ll pass on the video. Why not read my 60 page PDF of all my own posts, and come back with numbers. An example of when MMA actually is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick -<br />
MMA assumes the extra funds are available as well, of course it only works with the money the user has. If my user (of my free spreadsheet, or of nothing) does have the $200 one month, neither does the MMA user.<br />
The reliance on an equity line as emergency fund doesn&#8217;t require MMA, anyone can do this. To be sure, it&#8217;s not recommended either way, but there&#8217;s no magic to the MMA user having that available. </p>
<p>Congrats on the SAT, if that&#8217;s the case. Usually those who do that have a certain personality, a bit more black and white, and a bit too logical, almost to a fault. We usually don&#8217;t fall for nonsense like this. </p>
<p>By the way, the user with all the other debt should focus on paying that debt off, highest rate first. It makes little sense to throw $3500 to this software when the algorithm is so simple. &#8220;Pay all account&#8217;s minimums, and send any extra funds to the highest interest rate debt.&#8221; </p>
<p>You do get points for your paragraphs, though. We find many agents going off on incoherent rants with no structure. Your points are well presented, even though I dispute the validity of each and every one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll pass on the video. Why not read my 60 page PDF of all my own posts, and come back with numbers. An example of when MMA actually is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas St Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-331735</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas St Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-331735</guid>
		<description>Hello Joe,

I&#039;ve NOT read all 801 comments here, but I have read several of yours.

I too aced the Math SATs in high school, for what ever that is worth.

I&#039;ve done a ton of investigation on this MMA thing and built an Amortization Table with the ability to add additional money to the monthly mortgage payment to see how it would compare.

You are right, IF, and this is a HUGE/BIG if, you pay $200 additionally each and every month for 21.1 years, you will beat the MMA, which including the $3,500 fee, comes out at 21.4 years.  If you miss on average one $200 extra payment per year, its dead even, so probably throw Christmas gifts out each year and use the $200 for your mortgage - NOT!

So if you have THAT kind of discipline, have at it, but we all know that * LIFE * gets in the way, the car breaks down, a kid gets sick, the A/C goes out, etc. and you DON&#039;T make that extra $200 for a month, then the feeling is that next month to catch up you REALLY should do $400 that you DON&#039;T have so you don&#039;t do it then either, and just like going to the gym every day, then miss a day, then well I missed yesterday I&#039;ll start back next week, and before you know it, you&#039;ve NOT been back at all.  Same thing happens with the &quot;I&#039;ll pay $200 extra a month&quot; scenario and over 98% of those who start that discipline abandon it wihtin the first year.

With the MMA system, at least it will get you back on track, unless you fully abandon the software as well, in which case, its not the software&#039;s fault, it was trying and recalculating to keep you on track.

Even though the $200 scenario shows it beating the MMA, I&#039;ve run dozens of scenarios where it DIDN&#039;T, and if you add in other debts such as auto loans and a couple credit cards, it DOES almost become impossible for you to figure out how much and when additional amounts should go to each debt.   And who JUST has a mortgage these days without ANY other debt as well?  Almost nobody.

One last thing, the &quot;I&#039;ll pay an extra $200 a month&quot; plan does not leave you liquid, it uses most available cash to do so, and in the case of an emergency, you can&#039;t just go back to the bank and say, &quot;I&#039;ve paid an extra $2,400 last year and could use it, would you kindly give it back?&quot;  They&#039;d say, sure, just take out another loan, which just increased your monthly expenses and your debt load.

Feel free to watch my video series at
NeverRefi dot com / stnick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Joe,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve NOT read all 801 comments here, but I have read several of yours.</p>
<p>I too aced the Math SATs in high school, for what ever that is worth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a ton of investigation on this MMA thing and built an Amortization Table with the ability to add additional money to the monthly mortgage payment to see how it would compare.</p>
<p>You are right, IF, and this is a HUGE/BIG if, you pay $200 additionally each and every month for 21.1 years, you will beat the MMA, which including the $3,500 fee, comes out at 21.4 years.  If you miss on average one $200 extra payment per year, its dead even, so probably throw Christmas gifts out each year and use the $200 for your mortgage &#8211; NOT!</p>
<p>So if you have THAT kind of discipline, have at it, but we all know that * LIFE * gets in the way, the car breaks down, a kid gets sick, the A/C goes out, etc. and you DON&#8217;T make that extra $200 for a month, then the feeling is that next month to catch up you REALLY should do $400 that you DON&#8217;T have so you don&#8217;t do it then either, and just like going to the gym every day, then miss a day, then well I missed yesterday I&#8217;ll start back next week, and before you know it, you&#8217;ve NOT been back at all.  Same thing happens with the &#8220;I&#8217;ll pay $200 extra a month&#8221; scenario and over 98% of those who start that discipline abandon it wihtin the first year.</p>
<p>With the MMA system, at least it will get you back on track, unless you fully abandon the software as well, in which case, its not the software&#8217;s fault, it was trying and recalculating to keep you on track.</p>
<p>Even though the $200 scenario shows it beating the MMA, I&#8217;ve run dozens of scenarios where it DIDN&#8217;T, and if you add in other debts such as auto loans and a couple credit cards, it DOES almost become impossible for you to figure out how much and when additional amounts should go to each debt.   And who JUST has a mortgage these days without ANY other debt as well?  Almost nobody.</p>
<p>One last thing, the &#8220;I&#8217;ll pay an extra $200 a month&#8221; plan does not leave you liquid, it uses most available cash to do so, and in the case of an emergency, you can&#8217;t just go back to the bank and say, &#8220;I&#8217;ve paid an extra $2,400 last year and could use it, would you kindly give it back?&#8221;  They&#8217;d say, sure, just take out another loan, which just increased your monthly expenses and your debt load.</p>
<p>Feel free to watch my video series at<br />
NeverRefi dot com / stnick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-6#comment-328698</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328698</guid>
		<description>Wow, thank you. I tried emailing the company and got no response, so I filed a report with the BBB. I didn&#039;t want to do that, but it was  my last resort, especially after realizing that my agent forged his wife&#039;s signature on the paperwork. I know a lot of people have different opinions on the program, but for me, I watched my bank account get dangerously low. The program would have had me overdrawing on my checking account and bouncing all my bills. I really do appreciate your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thank you. I tried emailing the company and got no response, so I filed a report with the BBB. I didn&#8217;t want to do that, but it was  my last resort, especially after realizing that my agent forged his wife&#8217;s signature on the paperwork. I know a lot of people have different opinions on the program, but for me, I watched my bank account get dangerously low. The program would have had me overdrawing on my checking account and bouncing all my bills. I really do appreciate your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyDaGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328378</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyDaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328378</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian,

What happened to that $8500 loan? Did MMA tell you to write a check from the HELOC to pay it off? What is its interest rate and monthly payment?

One of the tricks that MMA uses is to pay off any outstanding debt you have using the HELOC and &quot;steal&quot; that monthly payment to pay off your mortgage. You magically have extra money to pay down your mortgage while the HELOC balance isn&#039;t paid off as fast as it ought to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p>
<p>What happened to that $8500 loan? Did MMA tell you to write a check from the HELOC to pay it off? What is its interest rate and monthly payment?</p>
<p>One of the tricks that MMA uses is to pay off any outstanding debt you have using the HELOC and &#8220;steal&#8221; that monthly payment to pay off your mortgage. You magically have extra money to pay down your mortgage while the HELOC balance isn&#8217;t paid off as fast as it ought to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328370</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328370</guid>
		<description>&quot;I agree a DIY approach will probably save money but I would have to be really good with math.&quot;

You were told this, but it isn&#039;t true.  When your HELOC rate is lower than your mortgage rate, the optimal amount is &quot;as much as possible&quot;, though as Joe correctly pointed out, the bigger the number, the bigger the risk.  When it is more than your mortgage rate, it&#039;s equal to your monthly income the first month, and your discretionary income after that.  That&#039;s it.  The funny thing is the MMA software doesn&#039;t ever seem to use the optimal amounts.

If Joe is right in estimating your savings at $300/yr, that means you have a minimum of 12 years until you&#039;ve paid for the software with your savings, and that ignores the interest on the additional $3500, which you carry until the mortgage is paid off....probably adding another few years to your break even date.  12 years for principal, plus another few for added interest, for many users, the break even never happens because you would pay off the house before breaking even with what you could have done easily on your own.

As Joe said, you like it, so be happy with what you don&#039;t know.  Just please don&#039;t recommend putting others into the same system when just a minimal amount of information will give them a free and better alternative.  Handing over your finances to a black box is not a good thing.

calvin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree a DIY approach will probably save money but I would have to be really good with math.&#8221;</p>
<p>You were told this, but it isn&#8217;t true.  When your HELOC rate is lower than your mortgage rate, the optimal amount is &#8220;as much as possible&#8221;, though as Joe correctly pointed out, the bigger the number, the bigger the risk.  When it is more than your mortgage rate, it&#8217;s equal to your monthly income the first month, and your discretionary income after that.  That&#8217;s it.  The funny thing is the MMA software doesn&#8217;t ever seem to use the optimal amounts.</p>
<p>If Joe is right in estimating your savings at $300/yr, that means you have a minimum of 12 years until you&#8217;ve paid for the software with your savings, and that ignores the interest on the additional $3500, which you carry until the mortgage is paid off&#8230;.probably adding another few years to your break even date.  12 years for principal, plus another few for added interest, for many users, the break even never happens because you would pay off the house before breaking even with what you could have done easily on your own.</p>
<p>As Joe said, you like it, so be happy with what you don&#8217;t know.  Just please don&#8217;t recommend putting others into the same system when just a minimal amount of information will give them a free and better alternative.  Handing over your finances to a black box is not a good thing.</p>
<p>calvin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joetaxpayer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328368</link>
		<dc:creator>Joetaxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328368</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, not to mention you guys got the girls.

All I&#039;d suggest to you now is that if you have an employer who offers any match on your 401(k), take it, don&#039;t miss a dime of match to prepay a mortgage. And don&#039;t pay a dime of high interest credit card debt to pay the mortgage. I wish you well, I hope your knees still work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, not to mention you guys got the girls.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;d suggest to you now is that if you have an employer who offers any match on your 401(k), take it, don&#8217;t miss a dime of match to prepay a mortgage. And don&#8217;t pay a dime of high interest credit card debt to pay the mortgage. I wish you well, I hope your knees still work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328366</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328366</guid>
		<description>So you were one of those math guys in high school.  I was the football player.  You math guys seemed a little geeky then but I truly appreciate the abilites you have now.  When I went through the MMA figures I thought that if MMA cut over four months off my repayment time compared to what I could do myself I would save money.  My monthly mortgage is just less than $900.  The MMA program is cutting off at least 24 months and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s more than that compared with what would happen if I did my own pay down.  I know that&#039;s a simple way for a simple football player to look at it, but leveraging the banks money through a heloc will more than help me recoop the $3,500 start up fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you were one of those math guys in high school.  I was the football player.  You math guys seemed a little geeky then but I truly appreciate the abilites you have now.  When I went through the MMA figures I thought that if MMA cut over four months off my repayment time compared to what I could do myself I would save money.  My monthly mortgage is just less than $900.  The MMA program is cutting off at least 24 months and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s more than that compared with what would happen if I did my own pay down.  I know that&#8217;s a simple way for a simple football player to look at it, but leveraging the banks money through a heloc will more than help me recoop the $3,500 start up fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joetaxpayer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328361</link>
		<dc:creator>Joetaxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328361</guid>
		<description>Be happy and avoid anti-MMA posts. You bought the program, and are happy with it. 

My mission is to talk to people before the sale. My message is simple, &quot;at the end of each month, send your extra money to the mortgage, marked as principal.&quot; repeat.
It&#039;s far more than 95%, I&#039;m the guy who aced the Math SATs in high school. I didn&#039;t play football, but got an A in gym as I tutored the players to keep their grades high enough to keep playing. 
But - there&#039;s no math to do this, well, maybe just adding that bit to the check, but anyone can add with a calculator, right? MMA agents are trained to convince you that the math is beyond you. My secret? There is no math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be happy and avoid anti-MMA posts. You bought the program, and are happy with it. </p>
<p>My mission is to talk to people before the sale. My message is simple, &#8220;at the end of each month, send your extra money to the mortgage, marked as principal.&#8221; repeat.<br />
It&#8217;s far more than 95%, I&#8217;m the guy who aced the Math SATs in high school. I didn&#8217;t play football, but got an A in gym as I tutored the players to keep their grades high enough to keep playing.<br />
But &#8211; there&#8217;s no math to do this, well, maybe just adding that bit to the check, but anyone can add with a calculator, right? MMA agents are trained to convince you that the math is beyond you. My secret? There is no math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328360</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328360</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,
I do use the Heloc as a checking account now.  I don&#039;t know all the math behind it but I assume that there is a tipping point as to how much to use out of a heloc to apply towards mortgage.  If I take out too much I end up paying too much towards interest on the heloc.  If I don&#039;t take enough on the heloc I don&#039;t maximize my repayment time.  Again, I don&#039;t know the math on that one.  I do realize the risk of using a heloc and have other assets to cover if need arises.  I agree a DIY approach will probably save money but I would have to be really good with math.  I&#039;m not.  What is really nice with the MMA is that I&#039;m online about 5 minutes per week.  I have a sound plan for getting out of debt quickly.  I might have spent $3,500 but my total interest savings will be between $25,000 and $35,000 over the life of my mortgage.  (I did a best case and worse case (hopefully) scenario.  What I got for the money was a solid plan that changes in real time with my financial situation.  It&#039;s easy, it&#039;s accurate, the service from the company after the sale has been terrific and for the 95% of us who aren&#039;t as good with the math as you are, and I say that sincerely, it gets us out of debt quickly.  I really like using the program.  It&#039;s motivational and it has done exactly what my agent told me it would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,<br />
I do use the Heloc as a checking account now.  I don&#8217;t know all the math behind it but I assume that there is a tipping point as to how much to use out of a heloc to apply towards mortgage.  If I take out too much I end up paying too much towards interest on the heloc.  If I don&#8217;t take enough on the heloc I don&#8217;t maximize my repayment time.  Again, I don&#8217;t know the math on that one.  I do realize the risk of using a heloc and have other assets to cover if need arises.  I agree a DIY approach will probably save money but I would have to be really good with math.  I&#8217;m not.  What is really nice with the MMA is that I&#8217;m online about 5 minutes per week.  I have a sound plan for getting out of debt quickly.  I might have spent $3,500 but my total interest savings will be between $25,000 and $35,000 over the life of my mortgage.  (I did a best case and worse case (hopefully) scenario.  What I got for the money was a solid plan that changes in real time with my financial situation.  It&#8217;s easy, it&#8217;s accurate, the service from the company after the sale has been terrific and for the 95% of us who aren&#8217;t as good with the math as you are, and I say that sincerely, it gets us out of debt quickly.  I really like using the program.  It&#8217;s motivational and it has done exactly what my agent told me it would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joetaxpayer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328358</link>
		<dc:creator>Joetaxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328358</guid>
		<description>Ok. At a rate of 2.5% on the HELOC, the shuffle can save you some money, I get that. On a 6% mortgage, the 3.5% savings is nearly $300/yr after taxes, good. But - 
(a) you could do this on your own, and work from a HELOC instead of maintaining a checking balance. 
(b) you could choose your own comfort level, why not use $30,000 HELOC draw? It seems that when the HELOC rate is below the mortgage rate, the MMA software doesn&#039;t know what to do. 
(c) my agreement that HELOC use helps you a bit notwithstanding, you realize there&#039;s risk associated with that type of account, it&#039;s a lien on your home. $50K in CC debt, no problem, they can try to collect. $5K on HELOC, you can get foreclosed on. 
(d) don&#039;t confuse &quot;daily balance&quot; accounting with borrowing interest free. I read an MMA endorsement, guy borrows $20K on June 29th, and is amazed how the interest was pennies, based on a June 30th statement date. HELOC is calculated on daily balance, so you pay the full rate on money you owe each day. The shuffle lets you &quot;earn&quot; 2.5% on your cash flow instead of the 0% you&#039;d get in checking.

All well and good, but all the savings don&#039;t add to enough to fund the MMA fee of $3500. I&#039;ve done the math many times and proven MMA cannot beat DIY. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. At a rate of 2.5% on the HELOC, the shuffle can save you some money, I get that. On a 6% mortgage, the 3.5% savings is nearly $300/yr after taxes, good. But &#8211;<br />
(a) you could do this on your own, and work from a HELOC instead of maintaining a checking balance.<br />
(b) you could choose your own comfort level, why not use $30,000 HELOC draw? It seems that when the HELOC rate is below the mortgage rate, the MMA software doesn&#8217;t know what to do.<br />
(c) my agreement that HELOC use helps you a bit notwithstanding, you realize there&#8217;s risk associated with that type of account, it&#8217;s a lien on your home. $50K in CC debt, no problem, they can try to collect. $5K on HELOC, you can get foreclosed on.<br />
(d) don&#8217;t confuse &#8220;daily balance&#8221; accounting with borrowing interest free. I read an MMA endorsement, guy borrows $20K on June 29th, and is amazed how the interest was pennies, based on a June 30th statement date. HELOC is calculated on daily balance, so you pay the full rate on money you owe each day. The shuffle lets you &#8220;earn&#8221; 2.5% on your cash flow instead of the 0% you&#8217;d get in checking.</p>
<p>All well and good, but all the savings don&#8217;t add to enough to fund the MMA fee of $3500. I&#8217;ve done the math many times and proven MMA cannot beat DIY. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328356</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328356</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,
Here is what happened my first month.  The program told me to pay off $10 K out of my heloc to my mortgage principle.  Then it instructed me to put all my income into the heloc as a principle payment.  That suppressed my average daily balance significantly and with a heloc its the average daily balance which dictates my interest payment.  My actual figures are at home so I&#039;m doing this from memory.  My initial average daily balance for the heloc was about $6,000, the interest rate was 2.5% and the first monthly payment was $11.22.  So, I borrowed $10 K on my heloc, paid interest on only $6K, and got to use $4k basically interest free. My $75 per month positive cash flow continues to drive down my average daily balance.  When my ADB gets to a certain tipping point the program instructs me hit up my heloc again and pay off principle on my mortgage.  By doing this again and again the mortgage/debt payback is accelerated.  I will admit to not being a financial wizard, but the concept makes sense to me and it is certainly working for me.  I can see it in my bank statements.  The mortgage principle is down 10K and all the front loaded interest has gone with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,<br />
Here is what happened my first month.  The program told me to pay off $10 K out of my heloc to my mortgage principle.  Then it instructed me to put all my income into the heloc as a principle payment.  That suppressed my average daily balance significantly and with a heloc its the average daily balance which dictates my interest payment.  My actual figures are at home so I&#8217;m doing this from memory.  My initial average daily balance for the heloc was about $6,000, the interest rate was 2.5% and the first monthly payment was $11.22.  So, I borrowed $10 K on my heloc, paid interest on only $6K, and got to use $4k basically interest free. My $75 per month positive cash flow continues to drive down my average daily balance.  When my ADB gets to a certain tipping point the program instructs me hit up my heloc again and pay off principle on my mortgage.  By doing this again and again the mortgage/debt payback is accelerated.  I will admit to not being a financial wizard, but the concept makes sense to me and it is certainly working for me.  I can see it in my bank statements.  The mortgage principle is down 10K and all the front loaded interest has gone with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joetaxpayer</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328353</link>
		<dc:creator>Joetaxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328353</guid>
		<description>Brian,
You wrote &quot;Using MMA I paid off that much ($10K?) in my first two months.&quot;
Look at it from a &#039;balance sheet&#039; perspective. In the first second you purchased this, your balance sheet dropped by $3500. The fact that it saved you future interest is an obfuscation purposely shown by agents to divert you from that fact. It is easily canceled by the future interest on the $3500 owed in the HELOC. 
With no numbers, I&#039;ll assume 6% HELOC. It will take 53 months to pay off the $3500 with your extra $75/mo. 4 years of your money just to get back to break even. 
Besides my civility, I hope you notice I do my best to stick to numbers. 
Add up all your debt right now, the last statements for Mortgage, HELOC, CC. How much less is it than the day before you bought MMA (and when was that?)
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
You wrote &#8220;Using MMA I paid off that much ($10K?) in my first two months.&#8221;<br />
Look at it from a &#8216;balance sheet&#8217; perspective. In the first second you purchased this, your balance sheet dropped by $3500. The fact that it saved you future interest is an obfuscation purposely shown by agents to divert you from that fact. It is easily canceled by the future interest on the $3500 owed in the HELOC.<br />
With no numbers, I&#8217;ll assume 6% HELOC. It will take 53 months to pay off the $3500 with your extra $75/mo. 4 years of your money just to get back to break even.<br />
Besides my civility, I hope you notice I do my best to stick to numbers.<br />
Add up all your debt right now, the last statements for Mortgage, HELOC, CC. How much less is it than the day before you bought MMA (and when was that?)<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328352</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328352</guid>
		<description>Brian,

      The math is very straightforward.  The MMA cannot be doing what you are saying it&#039;s doing.  You either have more discretionary income than you think, or you are looking at the results incorrectly.  I am more than happy to show you where your discrepency is, but it would mean putting some numbers out there (income, expenses, etc).  If you only have $75 extra a month, the most the MMA can send to your mortgage is $75 a month plus a few dollars in interest, while the extra $3500 in debt generates and extra $10-$20 in interest alone, not to mention the extra principal owed.

I&#039;m not trying to call you out or call you a liar, I&#039;m just saying the math is saying your numbers can&#039;t be right.  Something is different from what you think it is.  The most common one is bi-weekly income.  If you are paid every two weeks, and you have $75 left over each month *that you get two paychecks*, then you have substantially more income since you have two paychecks unaccounted for in your $75/month.  Just one thing it could be.  We have run literally hundreds of simulations of this process.  We know exactly what it&#039;s doing.  It never wins with the $3500 anchor, and rarely wins without it.

Calvin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>      The math is very straightforward.  The MMA cannot be doing what you are saying it&#8217;s doing.  You either have more discretionary income than you think, or you are looking at the results incorrectly.  I am more than happy to show you where your discrepency is, but it would mean putting some numbers out there (income, expenses, etc).  If you only have $75 extra a month, the most the MMA can send to your mortgage is $75 a month plus a few dollars in interest, while the extra $3500 in debt generates and extra $10-$20 in interest alone, not to mention the extra principal owed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to call you out or call you a liar, I&#8217;m just saying the math is saying your numbers can&#8217;t be right.  Something is different from what you think it is.  The most common one is bi-weekly income.  If you are paid every two weeks, and you have $75 left over each month *that you get two paychecks*, then you have substantially more income since you have two paychecks unaccounted for in your $75/month.  Just one thing it could be.  We have run literally hundreds of simulations of this process.  We know exactly what it&#8217;s doing.  It never wins with the $3500 anchor, and rarely wins without it.</p>
<p>Calvin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/united-first-financial-money-merge-accounts-scam-or-legit.html/comment-page-7#comment-328349</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2824#comment-328349</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,
Thank you for your very civil reponse.  I know you feel strongly about what you believe so I appreciate your polite rejoinder.  I think I understand your plan but if I sent the $3,500 towards mortgage principle and then the $75 per month to mortgage principle as you suggest, that would give me $4,400 towards principle the first year and then roughly $1,000 per year towards paying off my principle.  That would take me six years to pay off $10,000 of principle.  Using MMA I paid off that much in my first two months.  If my financial situation stays the same that means I will only be paying $11 per month for 102 months, a total of $1,122 in Heloc interest to be rid of my whole debt. The mortgage interest cancelled by that $1,122 is a little more than $25,000.  Your suggestion of early pay off is good but the MMA has accelerated my payoff in a way that is far more helpful to my financial long term health.  Plus if I invest my mortgage payment at 1% after my mortgage is paid off I will have accumulated about $40,000 plus dollars between the time of my early pay off and what would have been my initial pay off date.  I would have lost the opportunity to accumulate that money if not for the MMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,<br />
Thank you for your very civil reponse.  I know you feel strongly about what you believe so I appreciate your polite rejoinder.  I think I understand your plan but if I sent the $3,500 towards mortgage principle and then the $75 per month to mortgage principle as you suggest, that would give me $4,400 towards principle the first year and then roughly $1,000 per year towards paying off my principle.  That would take me six years to pay off $10,000 of principle.  Using MMA I paid off that much in my first two months.  If my financial situation stays the same that means I will only be paying $11 per month for 102 months, a total of $1,122 in Heloc interest to be rid of my whole debt. The mortgage interest cancelled by that $1,122 is a little more than $25,000.  Your suggestion of early pay off is good but the MMA has accelerated my payoff in a way that is far more helpful to my financial long term health.  Plus if I invest my mortgage payment at 1% after my mortgage is paid off I will have accumulated about $40,000 plus dollars between the time of my early pay off and what would have been my initial pay off date.  I would have lost the opportunity to accumulate that money if not for the MMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
