<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Yodlee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: raising4boys.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6614</link>
		<dc:creator>raising4boys.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=985#comment-6614</guid>
		<description>My only complaint about Yodlee is that it double reports one of our joint accounts... My wife and I both have retirement accounts at Vanguard, and we also have a joint account. This latter account is accessible through both of our logins, and it gets  pulled into the OnCenter twice (or at least is used to -- I haven&#039;t used it in awhile). I wrote to them about this and neever heard back, but it seems like it should be easy enough to allow users to manually exclude a duplicate account of this sort. The thing I really liked about Yodlee when I was checking it out was that it allows you to track all of your frequent flyer, etc. accounts all in one place, in addition to your finances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only complaint about Yodlee is that it double reports one of our joint accounts&#8230; My wife and I both have retirement accounts at Vanguard, and we also have a joint account. This latter account is accessible through both of our logins, and it gets  pulled into the OnCenter twice (or at least is used to &#8212; I haven&#8217;t used it in awhile). I wrote to them about this and neever heard back, but it seems like it should be easy enough to allow users to manually exclude a duplicate account of this sort. The thing I really liked about Yodlee when I was checking it out was that it allows you to track all of your frequent flyer, etc. accounts all in one place, in addition to your finances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6555</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 04:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=985#comment-6555</guid>
		<description>the majority of major banks use Yodlee&#039;s technology for online banking anyway, so I don&#039;t really lose any sleep over this.  Same w/ recent Quicken or MS Money, they use Yodlee to aggregate &amp; link the online banking accounts.  Same deal with Yahoo Finance&#039;s old feature.

so if you don&#039;t really like Yodlee.. you shouldn&#039;t use Quicken or MS Money&#039;s account linking features.  as mentioned I like the many features available.. and it&#039;s easy for me to login, click on update and do a quick scan of my various accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the majority of major banks use Yodlee&#8217;s technology for online banking anyway, so I don&#8217;t really lose any sleep over this.  Same w/ recent Quicken or MS Money, they use Yodlee to aggregate &amp; link the online banking accounts.  Same deal with Yahoo Finance&#8217;s old feature.</p>
<p>so if you don&#8217;t really like Yodlee.. you shouldn&#8217;t use Quicken or MS Money&#8217;s account linking features.  as mentioned I like the many features available.. and it&#8217;s easy for me to login, click on update and do a quick scan of my various accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 01:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=985#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re interesting is using Yodlee to avoid fraud, you can setup various alerts.  I love this feature.  Like, on all the credit card details page I can put, &quot;alert me whenever there is a transaction above $200.&quot;  I can also have, &quot;Notify me when my payment excess $....&quot; and this is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interesting is using Yodlee to avoid fraud, you can setup various alerts.  I love this feature.  Like, on all the credit card details page I can put, &#8220;alert me whenever there is a transaction above $200.&#8221;  I can also have, &#8220;Notify me when my payment excess $&#8230;.&#8221; and this is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/using-yodlee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 17:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=985#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>My problem with this type of thing is that you&#039;re betting on the security and reliability of one company. What happens when they &quot;lose&quot; your data or get cracked? All of a sudden, every acct you have is at risk.

And unless it affects California customers (unlikely, but still...), they don&#039;t even have to tell you when a security breach happened or if it affected you. I&#039;d much rather store everything in Quicken and my local PC. My security measures probably aren&#039;t as good, but neither is the payoff of breaking into my computer so I think I have better odds of protecting my data than a company does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with this type of thing is that you&#8217;re betting on the security and reliability of one company. What happens when they &#8220;lose&#8221; your data or get cracked? All of a sudden, every acct you have is at risk.</p>
<p>And unless it affects California customers (unlikely, but still&#8230;), they don&#8217;t even have to tell you when a security breach happened or if it affected you. I&#8217;d much rather store everything in Quicken and my local PC. My security measures probably aren&#8217;t as good, but neither is the payoff of breaking into my computer so I think I have better odds of protecting my data than a company does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

