This is a five part series written by Trent of Stock Market Beat ^{[3]} and each part will be published this week. In Part 1 we showed how to calculate the present value of a cash flow that is expected to be received in the future: divide it by (1 + r)n. In Part 3 we concluded by saying the value of a stock is the present value of all the dividends the shareholder will receive, plus the present value of whatever it will be worth when the investor decides to sell it. Simple, eh?

Sure. Until you consider that an investor may hold the stock for many years (we used 35 years as an example in Part 2) and both the dividend and the stock price will grow at an uncertain rate in the future. For our investor, that means first forecasting each dividend for the next 35 years, as well as figuring out what the stock price will be in 35 years, then calculating their present values as follows:

D1/(1+r) + D2/(1+r)2 + D3/(1+r)3… + D35/(1+r)35 + (Ending Stock Price)/(1+r)35. At this point, you are probably thinking “never mind. I’ll take my chances with the lower return on bonds.”

Fortunately, there is a formula that simplifies all of these calculations. It is called the discounted cash flow model. First, with a little algebra you can prove that, as long as the dividend stays the same over time the value of a stock today is equal to the current dividend divided by the required return. (V = CF/r) In Part 3 we used the example of Verizon, which pays a $1.62 dividend. If investors want to earn a 10% return on stocks (the current bond yield plus the historic average risk premium of about 5%) the stock would have to sell at $1.62/0.10 = $16.20 to be fairly priced. $32.24 sounds overvalued.

But didn’t we say that the dividend tends to grow? No problem. As long as we make the assumption that the rate of growth stays constant (or at least averages a certain rate) we can express the formula this way:

So if we make the assumption that Verizon’s dividend can grow 3% per year, the stock’s value climbs to $1.62/(0.10-0.03) = $23.14. By some algebraic manipulation, we can also figure out that at the current stock price of $32.24 investors on average expect 5% growth in the dividend.

There are even other variations of the model that allow you to assume different growth rates at different periods, but for most people the single-growth-rate model (also called the Gordon Growth Model) is sufficient.

One final note: We used the abbreviation “CF” in the model rather than “D” because the model works for any definition of cash flow. The most common variants are dividends, earnings, and free cash flow. The advantages and disadvantages of these measures are summarized in the following table:

Cash Flow Measure | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|

Dividends | Dividends per share is a commonly available metric. The investor actually receives them. Dividends cannot be manipulated. | Companies are typically able to pay more dividends than they actually do, so the measure is often too conservative. |

Earnings | Earnings per share is a commonly available metric. Over time, earnings should represent both free cash flow and the amount that can be paid out as dividends. | Unscrupulous management can manipulate reported earnings. Investors never receive “earnings” as a cash flow. |

Free Cash Flow | Less subject to manipulation than earnings. Represents the money available to a company to pay dividends or grow, which is ultimately what investors value. | Not widely reported. Investors never receive free cash flow. |

William Trent, CFA has been a securities analyst since 1996. Since March

2006 he has been the editor of

StockMarketBeat.com

Prior to that he was Senior Equity Analyst for New Amsterdam Partners LLC,

which manages $6 billion for pension funds, endowments and other

institutions. His experience covers all market-cap sizes and is primarily

within the TMT (Telecom, Media and Technology) and Transportation sectors.