The simple truth (from one whose been there and done that) is this:

The good news is that there is in fact NO LAW that requires US Citizens to pay an “income tax” as the IRS and “Tax Professionals” want you to believe; it would be unconstitutional on many grounds. The 16th amendment is simply the beginning of a TSUNAMI of OBFUSCATION, as it not only fails to define “income” (which is a relative term), but fails to REQUIRE anyone to PAY anything. This of course is apart from whether it was PROPERLY ratified or not (which at best is arguable and at worst, reveals a mountain of evidence to the contrary).

But let’s say the 16th Amendment was properly ratified, and that it says what they want you to believe it says. Is Jim Wang’s amazing revelation then, of “the law that requires you to pay”, really what he says it is?

It says..

“There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual … who is not a married individual a tax determined in accordance with the following table ….”

No, the above is simply another bit of trash floating down a never ending river of artfully created obfuscation. Please correct me if I am wrong, Jim, but the above simply says that something has been “IMPOSED”, but DOES NOT say anyone is “requirement” to pay anything!

If the question were “Is there a law that IMPOSES a tax on taxable incomes”, then Jim would be right (along with every other “Tax Professional” who has drank the Kool Aid and needs to justify their existence). But that isn’t the question.

ASSUMPTIONS and IMPLICATIONS do not make law. In the same “Tax Code”, there is a LONG LIST of tax “LIABILITIES”. There, they specifically use the correct language, stating CLEARLY who is “REQUIRED” to pay. Question: Why, Jim, is the “Income Tax” absent from that list?

Not to mention (in Jim’s example), there’s the usage of the term “taxable income”, which brings us to another sea of obfuscation, and at best, a totally confusing and contradictory mass of court rulings and and “Regulations”. At worst, “taxable income” (for puposes of the income tax) is not what “Taxpayers” think it is.

Which brings us to the the terms “Taxpayer” (as opposed to a “Tax Payer”), which is found in the same “Tax Code”, and the term “Non-Taxpayer”, which is found in court cases and congressional records. Can you define those terms for us Jim, especially the term “Non-Taxpayer”? Who would a “Taxpayer” and “Non Taxpayer” be, and how would one determine which one they are?

Jim, when I was in grade school, I learned that you cannot be forced to sign anything you don’t agree with or want to sign. Don’t you remember being instructed to always “read carefully” anything you sign? Can the courts (or anyone?) “legally” determine that the signing of a “Form 1040″ is an exception? Is anyone in fact REQUIRED BY LAW to sign one? And, if so, where is that law? If there is now law, can one be punished for not signing one?

Then of course there is the IRS’ use of the word “Voluntary”, which has been used by them to define our system of taxation as one of “Voluntary Compliance”. The two words used together form the ultimate contradiction in terms, as “compliance” implies there is something “required” of us to do; something we must “comply” with, while “voluntary” means the opposite; that we have free choice to do or not do.

We all know what “voluntary” means; it means you cannot be punished for NOT “volunteering” to do something. Can you Jim (or anyone) please tell me what part of the “Income Tax” I will NOT be punished for, if I don’t volunteer to do it? There’s your sign! Anyone who believes people who blatantly attempt to “change” the meanings of words is either ignorant or as wicked as those attempting to twist the meaning.

So we’re back to the same unanswered question Jim; where is the law???

The bad news is that (1) you CAN’T PROOVE A NEGATIVE, and (2)THEY HAVE ALL THE WHIPS! The lunacy of implying that “going to jail” (which I did) for not “voluntarily complying”, is somehow “proof” that there is a requirement is idiotic. Wake up! Our government is corrupt from top to bottom, including and especially the Judiciary; just because “the courts have ruled” that black is actually white, does not make it so! And, just because they HAVE THE POWER to throw you in jail, does not mean they have the LEGAL AUTHORITY to do so, nor does it “proove” there is a law requireing anyone to pay. It only prooves they have all the whips and must answer to no one (except God, where I believe they will have a great deal of “splainin” to do).

Our founding Fathers were pretty damn smart, and came from Europe where they were being taxed to death. Thus they were very careful in brilliantly creating the two great categories of taxes; direct/apportioned and indirect taxes. Notice that the imposition and payment of EITHER of these two LEGAL categories of taxes DOES NOT make it necessary for the government to know HOW MUCH MONEY YOU HAVE, nor know WHERE IT CAME FROM.

In a FREE country (which this is supposed to be), it is NONE OF THE GOVERNMENTS BUSINESS how much money you have nor how you got it (as long as it is lawfully obtained). If it is none of my business how much money is in YOUR WALLET, or even in my WIFE’S PURSE.. how can it be some THIRD PARTIES business? The truth is, the money we have COMES FROM GOD, and it is PRIVATE BUSINESS between He and Us.

The taxes needed to LEGALLY support our government, could easily and LAWFULLY be paid according to the original taxing clauses of the constuitution. As it is, congress has ordained and oversees the IRS, in the grandest plan of EXTORTION in history.

The good news after the bad news, is that “God is not mocked”, and “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord”; the ill-gotten “financial feces” of our corrupt government are about to make contact with the blades of a large, air moving device!

I wish that just one so called “tax Professional” would just one time TELL THE TRUTH and admit that, “No there is no law requiring you to pay income taxes; but if you don’t, they’ll throw you in jail!” That person I could respect! In the mean time don’t pee on my leg and tell it’s raining!

1.) The definition of “income” is the GAINS AND PROFITS FROM STOCKS AND BONDS”. Your LABOR is NOT income.

2.) ‘you are entiled to 100% OF THE FRUIT OF YOU ‘LABOR’.

3.) The IRS Code is PRIVATE LAW. (Federal Reserve Bankers law)

4.) The USSC has ruled that there is TWO DIFFERENT United States. So the question would be, WHICH US does the IRS and crooked judges rely upon? (Notice they NEVER SHOW ANY “LAW”) just IRS CODES.

5.) The definition of US citizen is a citizen of the federal government in Washington DC. So! if you are a ‘state national’ under 8 USC 1101(a)(21) you DONT owe alligence tot he US but to your state of BIRTH.

And the list goes on. Wesley Snipes is 100% CORRECT. And the jury was one of those uneducated, uninformed never READ anything themselves and followed the judges jury tampering instructions and convicted him.

As well there is NO LAW that requires anyone to even APPLYFOR, or possess a communists SSN. AND the ONLY WAY your EMPLOYER (EMPLOYER MEANS FEDERAL) can deduct ANY taxes is by a SSN AND W-4 which is a contract.

NOTICE THE IRS NOR PROSECUTORS “NEVER” SHOW A LAW THAT STATES YOU MUST PAY AN INCOME ON YOUR “LABOR”. You MUST pay an income tax if you own stocks and bonds as ruled by the USSC but NOT on YOUR LABOR.