What to Expect in Traffic Court

Email  Print Print  

Metro Transit PoliceI had the great pleasure of going to traffic court this morning. Yay!

I was there to contest a ticket I received for making an improper left turn through a red light. The ticket was for $90 and I’m unsure how many points it would’ve been, but an improper turn costs 1 point and failure to stop at a red is 2 points. Do I get both? Or just the worse of the two? I wasn’t sure but I knew points usually meant my insurance would go up and I wanted to avoid that at all costs.

Everything contained in this article is based on my experience in a Maryland courtroom and with Maryland procedures, specifically Howard County District Court. The process and rules may be different in your jurisdiction.

Traffic Court Process

The process is very simple. The court schedules cases on a docket, which is a list of all the cases it will hear, every hour. You should appear in court about fifteen minutes to half an hour before your session is scheduled to begin.

The judge calls your name, you announce you’re present and walk up to the defendent’s table. The judge will read you the charge against you and ask how you plead. Here’s where you have three options:

  1. Not Guilty – If the officer isn’t there, there is no one to testify against you, so always plead Not Guilty. The officer, if present, will be standing there at the other table, so it’s clear when they’re not there. If you plead Not Guilty there will be a brief trial.
  2. Guilty – You’re admitting that you are guilty and are now at the mercy of the judge. If it’s a minor offense and you have a clean record, you will often get Probation Before Judgement (more on that below).
  3. Guilty with Explanation – You are admitting that you are guilty and are now at the mercy of the judge, but this time you can give a limited explanation. Unless it’s a medical emergency, and you’ll need proof of that like a signed letter, chances are you are out of luck.

Court Strategy

When you go to court, you’re hoping that the other officer doesn’t show up. When I was there, I was the sixth or seventh case. The first case up was a young woman doing 20+ over the speed limit and she was the only one to luck out, her officer didn’t show. For every case I saw after that, an officer was present. The cases are scheduled so that an officer can be present for a large number of their contested tickets.

The officer that issued my ticket had about twenty or twenty five cases that day, he wasn’t missing it. He was a county police officer. The ones with only one or two cases that day were all state troopers.

Outside of a Not Guilty because the officer didn’t show, you’re hoping mostly for leniency and Probation Before Judgement. Probation Before Judgement is where the judge will not enter a guilty disposition/ruling, will still fine you (or reduce the fine), and not assess points. It’s your one free pass every three years. If your record is clean and the offense is minor, judges will usually grant you this.

The Trial

It sounds fancy but trial is very informal in a traffic court. The officer will tell his story, you will be given the opportunity to ask questions, then you tell your side of the story. Then the judge renders a decision.

In my case, the offense occurred near the end of January, and I believe my officer’s memory was questionable. However, I wasn’t any better. I had made a left turn when the light was yellow and I believe the officer made a judgment call about my turning on red. I remembered that he was in the opposing lane of traffic and didn’t have a clear line of sight to the light. Unfortunately, he testified that he was behind me, which threw me for a loop, and I couldn’t be certain, so I didn’t contest that (mistake). He also called my car a Toyota GT, rather than Toyota Celica (GT), I probably should’ve contested that (another mistake). My only defense was that the intersection was monitored by a red light camera and I wasn’t issued a ticket, which didn’t fly in court.

In the end, the verdict was Probational Before Judgement, my fine was reduced from $90 to $45.00, and no points were assessed. After court fees of $25.50, I paid $70.50. I saved $19.50, 1-3 points, and the whole process took less than an hour – I chalk that up as a win.

There was one case where a driver was going 105 in a posted 65 MPH speed zone, he had no explanation and was hoping the officer wouldn’t show up. When asked if he had any prior incidents, he said he couldn’t remember when he actually had one just last year. He had no strategy beyond hoping the officer wasn’t there, then wasn’t truthful with the judge, and so he had to pay is $500+, 5 point fine. The judge even stated that he failed to be “candid” with the court, so always tell the truth because they already know the answer.

Lessons Learned

Always contest. While I was nervous being in court (first time ever), I felt it was a great learning experience. Law is very much about technicalities and preparation, so use all of it to your advantage. Also, it’s important to ask the officer questions or contest what he testifies. I should’ve recognized he was reading from a script and not recalling the events. That was my mistake and I’ll know for next time, fortunately it was a small mistake.

The impact on your insurance may be minor. After the ticket, I emailed my insurance agent and asked about the impact on my insurance. She told me that chances are the underwriters wouldn’t even know about it unless I made a major change to my policy and even then, it was only a few dollars more per six months (< $10). That's one of the benefits of dealing with a local agent rather than a faceless insurance corporation.

Do you have any advice?

(Photo: nostri-imago)

{ 53 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts

RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

53 Responses to “What to Expect in Traffic Court”

  1. Zel says:

    Actually TheStrawman is correct.
    US courts are run under the UCC ( Universal Contract Courts ). That’s why a state can charge someone with a crime, say when a couple fights, even if the complaintant does not want to prosecute. We are considered assets of the state. That’s also why the government considers that it has the authority to relocate you forcibly, vaccinate you forcibly, etc… even if they don’t make such open use of that right often.

    We legally exchange freedoms which are ours under common law, for government benefits. We do this when we register the birth of our children, get a SSN card, a driver’s license, etc…

    Why don’t you google STRAWMAN and read about it.

    • Andrew says:

      This is asinine. The reason you can be tried for a crime even if the victim does not want you prosecuted is because a crime is an offense against society, not against the victim. Just because Strawman puts something up on a web site doesn’t make it true.

      • Basically your name calling solves nothing and all of you have not quoted from one source. I will not get into it, but under common law you can not be chared as a criminal if you have not damaged any property. Common law/Law of the Jungle/ God’s Law are derived from the first laws of common sense. Now, in a court of the sea/admiral/statutory/ucc/roman cannon law you must use their language as they do not recognize common law language. So to challege them he was right in not entering a contract, but wrong on what exact plea he was actually doing, because any response is considered a plea. He did a


        though he may have not known what he was doing.

        Please do some research before you spew ignorant accusations such as:

        “This is asinine” “Utter tripe”

        This degrades yourself by using such vulgar terms to describe an argument. Cockney

  2. Demenz says:

    Traffic fines are nothing more than a RACKETTEERS’ GAME and only cities and counties who either have a huge workload or are really lazy will give you any kind of break. Traffic fines and ESPECIALLY “MUNICIPAL JUSTICE” ARE OVERBEARING AND TYRANICAL! There needs to be some kind of benevolence system for underprivledged people such as SINGLE MOMS, ELDERLY and PEOPLE STRUGGLING TO MAKE ENDS MEET, it’s an EVIL disease we got happening here in the good ol’ U.S.ofA. and it has OVERFLOWED LIKE A STOPPED UP COMMODE and is RUNNING DOWN ON OUR HEADS LIKE PISS FROM GODZILLA! MAY ALL THE WORMS BURN IN HELL!!!

    • John says:

      It’s all about the revenue. Nothing more. They claim it’s for safety but that’s horseshit…and they know it. The same claim is made by the feds when they have a TSA agent feel you up at the airport, or when the gestapo barges into your home looking for something that isn’t there or when the State Police set up roadblocks and harass you even though you’ve commited no crime. We have a police state and it’s getting larger and meaner and more overt. But speeding tickets and parking tickets are just a way of making $$$ to fund a tyrannical and completely corrupt system.

  3. nik from aus says:

    I cant believe the aragantce of people who are obviously ignorant, If you understood common law and had even heard of the UCC your input might be helpfull. But you desribe the actions of contract law and legislation inforced by police who are ignorant and judges who have vested interests made by politicians who are hell bent on controling you and collecting more revenue. And you not only accept this as gosple but ridicule people who give you information that could re-empower you.

  4. james says:

    iwas told from a guy that came around from the da area i was the last one in court excet 2 people he said if i plead not guilty i would be found guilty even if i was not guilty it did not matter i promise you ,you will be found guilty trust me this was in front of the highway patrol man the da and the judge who was smiling and wiggling dockes in the air after loseing 2 day of work and see i did have my rights violated and the baggering of me and a tainted judge and if i want a continuance another day i got improper equipment and got out of there i did not do any thing wrong truck was blocking entrance and i did a proper left turn cause you can not do it from the center lane i will have a lawer next time

  5. Shannon says:

    Thank you so much for writing this! It is very helpful!

Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy

Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2016 by All rights reserved.