When I Grow Up I Want To Be CEO Of A Bad Company

Email  Print Print  

I’m not big on kicking CEO’s and playing “bash the latest CEO compensation report” but this is pretty freaking ridiculous – Ford CEO: $28M for 4 months work. Seriously, some kids want to grow up and play in some sports league and make millions for playing a game. When I grow up… I want to be CEO of a terrible company so that even though they continue to suck, I will still get paid off. Let’s ignore how staggering the losses were over at Ford (though it’d be hard to miss $12.7 billion dollars) and just think about how all the goodwill and morale boosting they try to do over there at Ford can be negated by just one footnote in a financial report.

Last year at my former company I received a 3.9% raise and was told that “raises were bad” in my department. I don’t put in 60-70 hour weeks like some people I know, I’m not the top 5% of the employee pool, and I can accept a weak 3.9% average raise (that lags inflation) but if you show me the CEO getting a 24% raise on an already eight figure salary – I’m going to think you’re full of crap. In fact, I’m liable to say “So long and thanks for all the fish” and peace out (which may have been the plan all along).

I understand the CEO game, they hired him in hopes that he’d be able to turn things around and they had to reward him even though he hasn’t gotten it done yet. If you don’t, no one else is going to come on board after him. The only problem with that strategy is that your front line workers are going to get angry and it’s the front line workers that do the real work anyway.

So, when I grow up, I want to be CEO of a bad company. Oh wait, then I’d have this on my conscience when I cashed my checks.

{ 8 comments, please add your thoughts now! }

Related Posts

RSS Subscribe Like this article? Get all the latest articles sent to your email for free every day. Enter your email address and click "Subscribe." Your email will only be used for this daily subscription and you can unsubscribe anytime.

8 Responses to “When I Grow Up I Want To Be CEO Of A Bad Company”

  1. dong says:

    I’m actually very sympathetic to the Ford management in this sitution. It’s the CEOs who’ve been on the job that get paid ludicrous amount of money when they’ve done a terrible job. I don’t know what the market for CEOs is like, but I imagine hiring proving talent takes alot of money. That said, I think a number of “less qualified” candidated would’ve taken the job for alot less given the challenge and opportunity that turning around Ford represents, however large companies like Ford are by nature risk adverse and unwilling to hire an unproven talent.

  2. CK says:

    Just get direct deposit.
    Conscience problem solved.

  3. eROCK says:

    Stock seems unaffected by the news.

    Personally, moves like this would make me sell. When a company is in trouble, the last thing they should be doing is devoting a large amount of money to someone that has done very little.

  4. Jesse says:

    I’d be careful about saying the front line workers do the “real work” — what do you mean by real work? I agree this is absurd, but wouldn’t want to downplay the absolutely massive amount of time and energy that the typical CEO pours into the company.

    • jim says:

      A company can survive with a mediocre CEO and an excellent workforce, it cannot survive with an excellent CEO and a mediocre workforce. Now, while you may argue that’s a mere numbers game (and I would agree), the compensation disparity is too alarming to be ignored.

  5. Shadox says:

    Jim, I am with Jesse on this one. Altough I agree that the CEO alone cannot turn a company around, a great CEO can make a huge difference to a company. Huge. In fact, my own division has seen an amazing transformation in the past year, all because of we got a new President. The workforce remained unchanged. A good CEO can make decisions that will completely change the direction of the company, dramatically boost morale, and inject momentum into the organization.

    Having said that, $28M for 4 months of horrible work is hardly what I would call fair compensation…

    There certainly is a problem when CEO pay is not tied to shareholder value, given that the shareholders are the true owners of the company.

  6. Ben says:

    How about paying the CEO a reasonable base salary then tying the rest of their income to the long-term performance of the company.

  7. dong says:

    I’m with Ben on this. Truly outlandish pay needs to tied to the long term performance of the company. That’s what stock grants and options are intended to do. However it often seems that the higher ups end up abusing the system. The board of directors of at public companies are not effective at defending the interests of the shareholders as they are usually more chummy with the management. That said many shareholders have short term interests as well. Couple management that thinks long term with shareholders who think longterm, and you have a well run company.

    Mulllay even if he’s a brilliant CEO has made gaffe already with his pay package. He should’ve have reconginized that an structured it in way that only ensureed him a big payout if he succeeded. It’s hard to inspire your workers when you get a huge payout when they are getting laid off.

Please Leave a Reply
Bargaineering Comment Policy

Previous Article: «
Next Article: »
Advertising Disclosure: Bargaineering may be compensated in exchange for featured placement of certain sponsored products and services, or your clicking on links posted on this website.
About | Contact Me | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Use | Press
Copyright © 2016 by All rights reserved.