<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Lower The Savings Bond Limit to $5,000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html</link>
	<description>personal finance blog with anecdotes, advice and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-374805</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-374805</guid>
		<description>You can still buy paper bonds with your IRS refund if you get one. Search IRS.gov for info.

I just realized that with the inflation rate where it as (and bound to go higher with what the fed is doing, or not doing), I-bonds are the best income-producing investment right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still buy paper bonds with your IRS refund if you get one. Search IRS.gov for info.</p>
<p>I just realized that with the inflation rate where it as (and bound to go higher with what the fed is doing, or not doing), I-bonds are the best income-producing investment right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Leber</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-372706</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Leber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-372706</guid>
		<description>It is getting worse. Effective Jan 1, 2012 paper bonds are being eliminated, cutting by 50% the maximum purchase permitted per individual on EE and I Bonds.
This all came about under President Obama. You might want to remember that come Nov 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is getting worse. Effective Jan 1, 2012 paper bonds are being eliminated, cutting by 50% the maximum purchase permitted per individual on EE and I Bonds.<br />
This all came about under President Obama. You might want to remember that come Nov 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Leber</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-371011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Leber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-371011</guid>
		<description>Why the maximum limit, and why keep lowering the limit? In essence every time the limit is cut you have to increase the number of investors to continue the same amount being invested. This is a very subtle means of wealth redistribution, a primary objective of the current administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the maximum limit, and why keep lowering the limit? In essence every time the limit is cut you have to increase the number of investors to continue the same amount being invested. This is a very subtle means of wealth redistribution, a primary objective of the current administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben M</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-344358</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 23:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-344358</guid>
		<description>Yes. This is the reason. Spending, not saving, will strengthen the U.S. economy. By enacting these changes, the Treasury is essentially discouraging saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. This is the reason. Spending, not saving, will strengthen the U.S. economy. By enacting these changes, the Treasury is essentially discouraging saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-344091</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-344091</guid>
		<description>They would rather we spent our money than saved it to keep the consumer driven economy afloat. But, since it&#039;s not politically correct to encourage that, the government comes up with the reasons you cited above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would rather we spent our money than saved it to keep the consumer driven economy afloat. But, since it&#8217;s not politically correct to encourage that, the government comes up with the reasons you cited above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-301195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-301195</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, I don&#039;t know why the restriction exists in the first place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, I don&#8217;t know why the restriction exists in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-301194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-301194</guid>
		<description>They restrict American citizens.... and yet they&#039;re freaking out trying to get the Chinese to invest in them.  Why not just take the restrictions off the Americans?  Is there money better than our money somehow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They restrict American citizens&#8230;. and yet they&#8217;re freaking out trying to get the Chinese to invest in them.  Why not just take the restrictions off the Americans?  Is there money better than our money somehow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-288935</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-288935</guid>
		<description>I believe that the treasury is concerned about the possibility of a currency collapse and does not want to be on the hook for paying out a rate that would equal that hyper inflation rate. 

In light of the Feds recent policy of throwing hundreds of billions into the financial system and the treasury probably going to go for another trillion or so we&#039;re likely to seek the 1929 German Mark look like a stable currency compared to the US dollar of the near term future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the treasury is concerned about the possibility of a currency collapse and does not want to be on the hook for paying out a rate that would equal that hyper inflation rate. </p>
<p>In light of the Feds recent policy of throwing hundreds of billions into the financial system and the treasury probably going to go for another trillion or so we&#8217;re likely to seek the 1929 German Mark look like a stable currency compared to the US dollar of the near term future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob P.</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-234512</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-234512</guid>
		<description>I believe this is just a marketing campaign.  Foreign buyers are drying up because of the dollar&#039;s negative real value from their perspective. (Everyone&#039;s inflation rate is running higher than ours... very suspect), the Government just dumped a whole lot of treasuries on the market by way of bailouts and &quot;swaps&quot;, so they are needing someone to pick up their debt!  Woo hoo! The average US citizen to the rescuse.  As they said, &quot;It won&#039;t affect many&quot; Well no kidding, as if Americans were much savers at all to start with!  With our negative real rate also, (i.e., inflation greater than short term treasuries yeidl and almost long term) I can not believe any sensible investor would plop more than a few grand down to start with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this is just a marketing campaign.  Foreign buyers are drying up because of the dollar&#8217;s negative real value from their perspective. (Everyone&#8217;s inflation rate is running higher than ours&#8230; very suspect), the Government just dumped a whole lot of treasuries on the market by way of bailouts and &#8220;swaps&#8221;, so they are needing someone to pick up their debt!  Woo hoo! The average US citizen to the rescuse.  As they said, &#8220;It won&#8217;t affect many&#8221; Well no kidding, as if Americans were much savers at all to start with!  With our negative real rate also, (i.e., inflation greater than short term treasuries yeidl and almost long term) I can not believe any sensible investor would plop more than a few grand down to start with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Heidbrink</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-234135</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Heidbrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-234135</guid>
		<description>The reason that the savings bond and I bond purchases has been restricted is due to some tax planning issues. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Certain capital gains and qualified dividends (i.e., adjusted net capital gains) are taxed at 15%, or 5% for taxpayers in the 15% or 10% tax brackets. Pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA) and extended by the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA), the 5% rate drops to 0% from 2008 to 2010. In 2011, these rates will sunset and revert to the pre-2001 rates of 15%, 28%, 31%, 36%, and 39.6%.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Therefore if you are a retiree or prospective retiree, you would want to spend the money out of your taxable accounts if possible during this time.  Where savings bonds and I bonds come into play is that the interest is deferred and would not count against your income for these years, allowing you to maximize the use of the capital gains window.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2006/1206/essentials/p40.htm&quot; title=&quot;Excellent article&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;  
Also see this &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?catid=52&amp;threadid=788113&quot; title=&quot;Fatwallet thread&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that the savings bond and I bond purchases has been restricted is due to some tax planning issues. </p>
<blockquote><p>Certain capital gains and qualified dividends (i.e., adjusted net capital gains) are taxed at 15%, or 5% for taxpayers in the 15% or 10% tax brackets. Pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA) and extended by the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA), the 5% rate drops to 0% from 2008 to 2010. In 2011, these rates will sunset and revert to the pre-2001 rates of 15%, 28%, 31%, 36%, and 39.6%.</p></blockquote>
<p>Therefore if you are a retiree or prospective retiree, you would want to spend the money out of your taxable accounts if possible during this time.  Where savings bonds and I bonds come into play is that the interest is deferred and would not count against your income for these years, allowing you to maximize the use of the capital gains window.<br />
<a href="http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2006/1206/essentials/p40.htm" title="Excellent article" rel="nofollow"><br />
Also see this &lt;</a><a href="http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?catid=52&amp;threadid=788113" title="Fatwallet thread" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Goldsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-231527</link>
		<dc:creator>David Goldsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-231527</guid>
		<description>I can only think of one explanation that makes sense to me.  

Those entrusted with the responsibility of deciding such things (The Deciders) were influenced, somehow, to get the Treasury out of competition with special interest groups.  Corporations and commissioned agents are willing to let the government &#039;bottom-feed&#039; on &quot;individuals with relatively small sums to invest,” while they do their business with the rest of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only think of one explanation that makes sense to me.  </p>
<p>Those entrusted with the responsibility of deciding such things (The Deciders) were influenced, somehow, to get the Treasury out of competition with special interest groups.  Corporations and commissioned agents are willing to let the government &#8216;bottom-feed&#8217; on &#8220;individuals with relatively small sums to invest,” while they do their business with the rest of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-231299</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-231299</guid>
		<description>Savings bonds encourage saving. But spending is what drives the economy. So... In addition to aribtrarily sending people checks, why not take steps to discourage saving?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Savings bonds encourage saving. But spending is what drives the economy. So&#8230; In addition to aribtrarily sending people checks, why not take steps to discourage saving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-230933</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-230933</guid>
		<description>Any chance that there is a preference to sell debt to people who won&#039;t exercise the debt&#039;s tax advantages ?  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance that there is a preference to sell debt to people who won&#8217;t exercise the debt&#8217;s tax advantages ?  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-230925</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-230925</guid>
		<description>May well be sooner than 3 weeks plus.  I bought mine at Wachovia on the 24th and they came today , May 1, dated April 28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May well be sooner than 3 weeks plus.  I bought mine at Wachovia on the 24th and they came today , May 1, dated April 28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/why-lower-the-savings-bond-limit-to-5000.html/comment-page-1#comment-230888</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/?p=2715#comment-230888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little concerned about it too but there isn&#039;t much we can do about it, the whole process seemed just so disorganized. Oh well, I guess we&#039;ll both find out in three weeks plus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little concerned about it too but there isn&#8217;t much we can do about it, the whole process seemed just so disorganized. Oh well, I guess we&#8217;ll both find out in three weeks plus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

